The Great Compromise provided solutions to allocating power between big and small states allocating power between big and small states
The Connecticut Compromise (also known as the Great Compromise of 1787 or the Sherman Compromise) was an agreement reached during the 1787 Constitutional Convention, which partially defined the legislative structure and representation of each state under the United States Constitution. did. It retained the bicameral legislature proposed by Roger Sherman with a proportional state representative in the House of Representatives or the House of Representatives, requiring the Senate or Senate to be evenly weighted across states. Each state has two representatives in the Senate.
Their so-called Great Compromise (or Connecticut Compromise in honor of its architect, Connecticut representatives Roger Sherman and Oliver Ellsworth) envisioned a dual system of parliamentary representatives. In the House of Representatives, each state is assigned a number of seats proportional to its population.
Learn more about The Great Compromise here:https://brainly.com/question/14190867
#SPJ1
What was the special emphasis of the book by the physician?
Jesus was human as well as divine.
Jesus was the true Son of God.
the last week of Jesus' life
events and sayings of the Last Supper
Answer:
your answer is Jesus was human as well as divine
Explanation:
I really hope this helps you
Answer:
Jesus was human as well as divine
Explanation:
i hope i helped ^^
What type of work did women in America commonly perform in the early 1800s?
A. Teaching at colleges and law schools
B. Campaigning for candidates and organizing political campaigns
C. Cooking, washing, and mending clothes for there families
D. Practicing medicine and dentistry
QUICK SOMEONE HELP ME
The birth of Hinduism occured in this empire
A) Abbasid
B) Safavid
C) Mughal
D) Ottoman
Answer:
C) Mughal
Explanation:
all the other ones are wrong
Which of the following landforms runs through both the United States and Canada?
Answer:
Rocky mountains
What were some political,economic,Or social reasons for Manifest Destiny
Answer:
Manifest Destiny was the reason for the revived interest in territorial expansion. With a sense of mission, people were tempted by the boundless tracts and sparsely settled land lying just beyond the borders of their country. There was also the growing desire to develop trade with the Far East. Going West would eventually open new trade routes.
Why does Frankenstein's monster kill in the novel? This is a deceptively simple question, so let me elaborate just a bit. What is his reason and motive for revenge? How does the monster admit that all of his killing could have been avoided? What moral burden does this place on us as readers?
Answer and Explanation:
1. The monster kills to take revenge on its creator. That's because he was rejected by Victor, which caused him a lot of pain and suffering, as revenge, he decided to cause pain and suffering for those who abandoned him, leaving him as lonely as he was.
2. The monster shows that all this would be avoided, if he had received a little affection, understanding and suppression of his emotional needs, but all this was denied to him by futile motives such as his appearance.
3. This represents a burden for us, as readers, because it makes us recognize ourselves both in the showroom, in need of attention and vindictive, and in Victor who is afraid of his creation and rules it because he is not beautiful.
The Ziggurat at Ur was a (2 points)
a.fortress
b.funerary monument
c.palace
d.temple platform
Answer:
D. A temple platform
Explanation:
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Because it’s temple platform
What was the Battle of Britain?
Answer:
It was a battle fought between the German Luftwaffe and the British RAF that was fought in the skies. The Germans tried bombing London while the RAF defended it. It lasted from July 10, to October 31.
Explanation: Hope this helps!
American public opinion about Cuba was most shaped by:
Answer:
D, yellow journalism
Explanation:
the media exaggerated harsh conduct
How did the pressure Governor Orval Faubus faced in Arkansas impact his actions? How is this different from the Supreme Court?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
The pressure Governor Orval Faubus faced in Arkansas impacted his actions in that he had to finally accept the court decision of integration of the Little Rock Nine to Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas.
Arkansas Governor, Orval Faubus, defied the federal government decision and blocked black teenagers from attending Little Rock Central High School.
The Major of Little Rock asked President Dwight Eisenhower for help and the President sent the National Guard to protect the nine African American kids from aggressions on the part of white people.
The Little Rock Crisis started when nine African American students were prevented from entering the public school premises in Little Rock Central High School. State governor Orval Faubus gave the order. The decision made the news and generated consternation in many citizens. The decision tarnished the reputation of the state to the degree that President Dwight Eisenhower had to intervene to resolve the issue and the students could get access to the school.
The pressure that was faced by Governor Orval Faubus in Arkansas was important as he finally accepted the court decision of integrating the Little Rock Nine to Central High School in Little Rock, Arkansas.
It should be noted that Governor Orval Faubus instructed the National Guard to turn away the nine African Americans away from coming to Central High school.
The governor defied the federal government decision and blocked black teenagers from attending Little Rock Central High School. The decision made the news and generated controversies and tarnished the reputation of the state. In the end, the nine children were finally allowed to come to school.
Learn more about Governor Orval Faubus on:
https://brainly.com/question/8690742
What is the fundamental problem in a society and the reason we study economics?
a) scarcity
b) lack of capital
18
c) the factors of production
d) labor shortage
Answer:
A
Explanation:
the fundamental economic problem facing all societies is that of scarcity.
What event led to the 1967 march to Baton Rouge?
the use of police violence against boycott participants during the bus boycott
the failure of the governor to heed the order to integrate public schools
the murder of an African American sheriff's deputy in an ambush attack
the passage of laws requiring voters to pass literacy tests and pay poll taxes
Answer:
A
Explanation:
MONKEY because
How was the Arab trade network connected to the return of Greek philosophy to Europe?
The Arabian trade routes provided a safe method of travel. Philosophers took advantage and journeyed along the routes, sharing their ideas.
B Trade brought great prosperity to the Arab Empire, which gave caliphs the wealth to sponsor philosophers and scholars at a time when Europe was struggling.
C Trade with China brought papermaking to the Arab Empire. This technology allowed Arab scholars to record their translations of Greek philosophical works and to share their translations with the West.
D Arab contact with the Byzantines exposed them to Greek philosophy, and the Arabs incorporated those ideas into their own belief system. Trade with Europe then returned those ideas as Europeans adopted the Arab system.
How was the personal feud between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr resolved?
A) Burr fled to England.
B) Hamilton had Burr arrested on charges of treason.
C) Burr shot and killed Hamilton in a duel
D) Hamilton issued a public apology to Burr.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Hamilton died from a gunshot wound by Aaron Burr in the famous 1804 duel they had. In fact, Burr suffered no remorse for killing Hamilton. Hamilton died that same day. So all the other answers are wrong.
Answer:
sadly the answer is in fact C
Explanation:
Aaron Burr got mad after Hamilton endorsed Jefferson and not him. He then challenged Hamilton to a duel and ultimately won.
In two or three sentences, compare the two Hamets. Identify one way in which they were similar and one way in which they were different
Answer and Explanation:
King Hamlet and Prince Hamlet had more differences than similarities and perhaps that is one of the main reasons why Hamlet was so thoughtful. King Hamlet acted quickly, showed points of cruelty to his enemies and used to solve his problems with the use of force. Although he was a good king, he was just as flawed as Claudios. Prince Hamlet on the other hand was not like that, and he was very thoughtful before acting, which made his actions slow, unlike his father's actions. In return, the two had a concern for the safety of the family and a strong vindictive desire.
Do you believe that the Right of Discovery outweighs the Right of Occupancy?
Explain your answer.
23. In order for a state's government to be considered an Oligarchy, it
must:
A. Derive its power from the people
B. Inherently have the best interest of its citizens at heart
C. develop a single entity dictatorship
D. ensure a group maintains supreme power
Answer:
D. ensure a group maintains supreme power
Explanation:
An oligarchy is a government run by a select few who make all the decisions in the government.
Excerpt taken from The Historic Rise of Old Hickory by Suzanne B. Williams
Four major candidates ran in the 1824 election, all under the "Democratic-Republican" name. One of the candidates, Andrew Jackson, was already famous. In the 1780s, he earned the right to practice law and served in various offices of the state government, including senator. He earned the nickname "Old Hickory" for his toughness as a general during the War of 1812 and First Seminole War. Jackson supported slavery and "Indian removal." This earned him support from voters in southern and frontier states. The other three candidates were John Quincy Adams of Massachusetts, Henry Clay of Kentucky, and William Crawford of Georgia.
U.S. presidents are elected through the Electoral College. The Founding Fathers worried that Americans were too spread out to learn enough about the candidates. Under the Electoral College, Americans cast their ballot for the popular vote, which chooses the electors for each state. The number of electoral votes each state equals the number of representatives and senators combined. The candidates must win an absolute majority of electoral votes to win the election.
In 1824, Andrew Jackson won the popular vote, but he did not win it in each state. Jackson and Adams both won many electoral votes. Jackson won the most with 99. However, a candidate needs an absolute majority of electoral votes to win. In 1824, Jackson needed 131 to win. When there is not majority winner, the election goes to the House of Representatives. This has only happened twice in U.S. history.
Even though he won the popular vote and many electoral votes, Andrew Jackson lost the presidency in 1824. John Quincy Adams was the Secretary of State at this time. Henry Clay was the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Henry Clay, receiving the least, was left out. However, as a leader in the House of Representatives, he had influence over the other members. Clay openly hated Jackson and there were rumors that Clay made a deal with Adams in exchange for his support. The House election declared John Quincy Adams president. Soon, he chose Henry Clay to fill the seat he left vacant, Secretary of State. Jackson was shocked and enraged. Although there was no inquiry of possible wrongdoing, Jackson accused Adams and Clay of making a "corrupt bargain."
John Quincy Adams was a disappointment as president. Many of his goals created divisions like federal funds for internal improvement. Some states thought that taking federal funds would force them to follow certain rules. They felt this reduced their rights as independent states. Jackson took advantage of issues like this one to gather more support. More Jackson supporters found their way to seats in Congress. He was as a man of the people and said Adams could never understand the common man’s concerns.
John Quincy Adams ran against Andrew Jackson in the 1828 election. Personal attacks grew even more vicious, but Andrew Jackson appealed to many. He believed government was for the common man. He believed in strict reading of the law and limited internal improvements. He also believed in states’ rights.
Andrew Jackson easily won the 1828 election, winning both the popular vote and a majority of electoral votes. Historians note the sectional nature of the voting. Support for Jackson was concentrated in South while Adams’ support was mostly in the North. Jackson was so popular because he brought changes to the government. He also wanted to make sure the government was responsible for its actions. Jackson pushed settlement into the frontier. He supported the Indian Removal act. He also defended the spread of slavery. Though his support was heavier in the South, he was determined to keep a unified nation. The rise and presidency of Old Hickory is memorable to Americans today.
Which statement makes a true comparison of the 1824 and 1828 elections?
> The losers in 1824 were the main candidates for president in 1828.
> Sectional divisions were appearing in 1824 and very clear in 1828.
> Candidates were more divided on the issues in 1828 than in 1824.
> More people voted in the election of 1824 than they did in 1828.
The answer is "Sectional divisions were appearing in 1824 and very clear in 1828!"
how do the names of different Textiles tell us about their histories
Answer:
The English term chintz comes from the Hindi word Chhint Chhint is a cloth with small and colourful flowery designs. ... (ii) Similarly, the word bandanna now refers to any brightly coloured and printed scraf for the head or neck.
Explanation:
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!HELP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!-In the period 1770-1825, challenges to the existing politician order led to revolutions in the Atlantic World.
-Develop an argument that evaluates the extend to which one or more states revolutionized their societies in this period.
Answer:
look ... it's me, the revolutions that were between those dates were the industrial revolution in England, political, economic, social and technological
Which New World crops started to be exported to Europe during the Columbian Exchange? Select all that apply
А
COCO
B
coffee
С
corn
D
garlic
E
rice
F
squash
Answer: A, C, and F
Explanation:
How did the Lowell factory change the way women worked in Massachusetts?
Answer:
Beginning in 1823, with the opening of Lowell's first factory, large numbers of young women moved to the growing city. In the mills, female workers faced long hours of toil and often grueling working conditions. Yet many female textile workers saved money and gained a measure of economic independence. The Lowell mills were the first hint of the industrial revolution to come in the United States, and with their success came two different views of the factories. For many of the mill girls, employment brought a sense of freedom.
I hope this helped you out!~ <3
-Dream
Answer: In 1834, when their bosses decided to cut their wages, the mill girls had enough: They organized and fought back. The mill girls "turned out"—in other words, went on strike—to protest. They marched to several mills to encourage others to join them, gathered at an outdoor rally and signed a petition saying, "We will not go back into the mills to work unless our wages are continued."
No one had ever seen anything like this. But if the mill girls were exuberant, managers and owners were horrified. "An amizonian [sic] display," one fumed. "A spirit of evil omen has prevailed." And they determined to crack down on the mill girls.
A showdown came and the bosses won. Management had enough power and resources to crush the strike. Within a week, the mills were operating nearly at full capacity. A second strike in 1836—also sparked by wage cuts—was better organized and made a bigger dent in the mills' operation. But in the end, the results were the same.
Those were hard defeats, but the mill girls refused to give up. In the 1840s, they shifted to a different strategy: political action. They organized the Lowell Female Labor Reform Association to press for reducing the workday to 10 hours. Women couldn't vote in Massachusetts or anywhere else in the country, but that didn't stop the mill girls. They organized huge petition campaigns—2,000 signers on an 1845 petition and more than double that on a petition the following year—asking the Massachusetts state legislature to cap the work day in the mills at 10 hours.
They didn't stop there. They organized chapters in other mill towns in Massachusetts and New Hampshire. They published "Factory Tracts" to expose the wretched conditions in the mills. They testified before a state legislative committee.
What's more, they campaigned against a state representative who was one of their strongest opponents and handily defeated him.
So what did the Lowell mill girls really win? In the short term, not much. That's how it often is with the first pioneers in social justice movements. Both of their strikes were crushed. And the only victory they won in their 10-hour workday campaign was pretty hollow. In 1847, New Hampshire became the first state to pass a 10-hour workday law—but it wasn't enforceable.
That was in the short term. But in the long term, the Lowell mill girls started something that transformed this country. No one told them how to do it. But they showed that working women didn't have to put up with injustice in the workplace. They got fed up, joined together, supported each other and fought for what they knew was right.
One of the mill girls put it this way: "They have at last learnt the lesson which a bitter experience teaches, not to those who style themselves their 'natural protectors' are they to look for the needful help, but to the strong and resolute of their own sex."
Today, millions of women in unions who teach our kids, fight our fires, build our homes and nurse us back to health owe a debt to the Lowell mill girls. They taught America a powerful lesson about ordinary women doing extraordinary things.
Extra
Foner, Philip S. (editor), The Factory Girls. University of Illinois Press, 1977. Howe, Daniel Walker, What Hath God Wrought: The Transformation of America, 1815-1845.Oxford University Press, 2009. Eisler, Benita, The Lowell Offering: Writings by New England Mill Women, 1840-1845. J.B. Lippincott, 1977. Dublin, Thomas, "The Lowell Mills and the Countryside: The Social Origins of Women Factory Workers, 1830-1850," in Weible, Robert; Ford, Oliver; and Marion, Paul (editors), Essays from the Lowell Conference on Industrial History, 1980 and 1981. Lowell Conference on Industrial History, 1981.
in which year did chandragupta maurya died
Answer:
died c. 297 bce
Explanation:
Chandragupta, also spelled Chandra Gupta, also called Chandragupta Maurya or Maurya, (died c. 297 bce)
Why might it be important to have fast, reliable transportation between Manchester and Liverpool?
Answer:
It might've been important to have fast, raliable transportation between these two town so as to quickly get goods exported. Since Manchester is a cotton producing city and liverpool a thriving port, it is especially important to get these goods ready for export. Railroad were important to get the transport of goods to be sold. For example, in North America, a relativley large country, railroads were nessasary to maximize the domestic distribution of goods.
Why did the Western Trail become the major route for driving cattle north by about 1876?
Answer:
More profitable
Explanation:
Although rail lines were built in Texas, the cattle drives north continued because Texas rail prices made it more profitable to trail them north.
HELP PLEASE I am unable to do because my teacher did not supply the history e-book required
Answer:
padhai wagera leave karke free fire khelo pagal log
What kinds of changes and reforms did muckraking journalists contribute towards? Give two examples.
Answer:
There were laws put in place to protect the quality of food, and to protect child workers.
Explanation:
Why would the Goodnight-Loving Trail or the Great Western trail be used to send cattle to California?
Answer:
The Goodnight–Loving Trail was a trail used in the cattle drives of the late 1860s for the large-scale movement of Texas Longhorns. It is named after cattlemen Charles Goodnight and Oliver Loving. Cattle drives moved large herds of livestock to market, to shipping points, or to find fresh pasturage. The practice was introduced to North America early during European colonization.
Explanation:
What does this simile mean? "The snow was as thick as a blanket." A The snow was inside the blanket. B The snow was very cold and wet. C A layer of snow covered everything. D D The warm blanket melted the snow.
Answer:
The answer of the question is c
HURRY HELP PLZZZ
How did General George Washington use the area's geography to his advantage?
A. He hid his troops in the dense forests and attacked British supply lines.
B. He and his troops snuck across the Delaware River to surprise the enemy.
C. He had his troops dig deep trenches for protection on the edge of the city.
D. He ordered the navy to transport additional troops on the Delaware River.
Answer:
He and his troops snuck across the Delaware River to surprise the enemy.
Explanation:
Answer: He and his troops snuck across the Delaware River to surprise the enemy.