A. "And so we, the Jews of Sighet, waited for better days that surely were soon to come." (paragraph 18)
D. "People gathered in private homes: no need to provoke the Germans." (paragraph 39)
Sentence A supports the answer to question 3 by showing that the community is waiting for better days, indicating that the current situation is not good. Sentence D supports the answer to question 3 by showing that the community is gathering in private homes in order to avoid the Germans, indicating that the people are afraid of the Germans and are trying to avoid them. Together, these sentences support the idea that the community is in a difficult situation and is trying to avoid persecution from the Germans.
Virginia had an elected assembly providing a representative government know as
Virginia had an elected assembly providing a representative government known as the following: C. Virginia House of Burgesses.
What is republicanism?Republicanism can be defined as a form of government that is centered around citizenship in a state and emphasizes their participation for the common good of a geographical area such as states, towns, and other smaller units in a colony.
This ultimately implies that, republicanism involves citizens selecting their representatives (delegates) from each town in a colony, especially through an electoral process such as in Article 8, Fundamental Orders of Connecticut and the Virginia House of Burgesses.
In conclusion, Virginia House of Burgesses simply refers to an elected assembly that is saddled with the responsibility of providing a representative government for the people.
Read more on republicanism here: https://brainly.com/question/5188360
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Virginia had an elected assembly providing a representative government known as?
answer choices
Parliament
Congress
Virginia House of Burgesses
House of Lords
identify the statements that describe liberal reformers during the gilded age.
-Liberal reformers feared that as lower classes looked to use government to further their own interests, democracy was becoming a threat to individual liberty and the rights to property.
-Some liberal reformers urged a return to property qualifications for voting.
Both given statements describe liberal reformers during the Gilded Age.
What is the Gilded Age?The Gilded Age was a period of rapid industrialization in America from 1865-1898. It was characterized by the extreme wealth of a few individuals, when many others lived in poverty. This era is frequently associated with political corruption and exploitation of immigrant labor.
During the Gilded Age, as lower classes looked to use government to further their own interests, liberal reformers feared that democracy was becoming a threat to individual liberty and the rights to property. And some liberal reformers urged a return to property qualifications for voting.
Learn more about Gilded Age at: https://brainly.com/question/4419066
#SPJ4
What does langston mean when he refers to a dream deffered?
The slaves had been free for almost 90 years when he penned this poem, but they were still not treated equally. This is his postponed dream.
What is meant when Langston Hughes discusses A Dream Deferred?The message of Langston Hughes' poetry "A Dream Deferred" is that people should be free to pursue their dreams and that, as was the case for many African-Americans at the time the poem was written and before, being unable to do so is destructive to people and causes sorrow.
What exactly does "A Dream Deferred" mean?The term "deferred dream" refers to a want that has been postponed or shelved by the dreamer. In the poem "Harlem," it is written, for instance, "Does it dry out like a raisin in the sun? Or swell up like a sore. (lines 2-4).
To Know more about slaves
https://brainly.com/question/17214427
#SPJ1
How bad was inflation in Germany after ww1?
Inflation in Germany after ww1 brought a financial tornado. The exchange rate between the dollar and the Mark was one trillion Marks to one dollar.
Prices doubled in Germany between 1914 and 1919. Germany lost the war after four dismal years. It was required by the Treaty of Versailles to make a reparations payment in Marks backed by gold, and it was also expected to lose some of the Upper Silesia and Ruhr region's production.
Between 1921 and 1923, particularly in 1923, the German Papiermark, the currency of the Weimar Republic, experienced hyper inflation. It significantly contributed to the nation's internal political turmoil.
To know more about Germany, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/1061130
#SPJ4
What does Roosevelt say is happening at that present moment to the
democratic way of life around the world?
Answer:
Every realist knows that the democratic way of life is at this moment being directly assailed in every part of the world——assailed either by arms.
Explanation:
The first complete set of written laws was made by:
Hatshepsut
Moses
Hammurabi
Answer:
Hammurabi
Explanation:
the first written set of laws is called The Code of Hammurabi
What a better place to grow up? The city or country?
better in what way? the country would be better for survival skills and learning to live off the land, and the city would be better for job opportunities and social lives.
During the tang and ong dynatie where did people tay a they traveled along the road and canal
During the Tang and Song dynasties of China (618-907 AD and 960-1279 AD, respectively), people usually traveled on roads and canals in government-run inns or private inns called "fangzhang"
These inns were on important transport routes and provided boarding and lodging for travelers. It was also used as a place for government officials and military personnel to rest on official business. In addition, government officials were responsible for overseeing the quality of service and security of inns so that travelers were treated appropriately and protected from bandits and other dangers. Some of these inns also played a role in maintaining public order and gathering intelligence for the empire. It was also used as a trading post where merchants could exchange goods and information.
Another accommodation option was to stay with friends or relatives along the route. In some cases, they also stayed in Buddhist and Taoist monasteries and provided lodging and meals to travelers.
Learn more about the tang and song dynasty here:https://brainly.com/question/1961463
#SPJ4
According to Malcolm X what is the d
Answer:
the difference between negro an black is that black is a scan color an Negro Is a slavery racism black name
Explanation:
no exceptions
What was elie’s first impression of auschwitz after leaving birkenau?
Elie's first impression of Auschwitz after leaving Birkenau is one of shock and disbelief.
In "Night" by Elie Wiesel, Elie and his father are transported to Auschwitz after a long journey in a crowded train. Elie describes his first impressions of Auschwitz as one of shock and disbelief, as he sees the camp's brutal reality. He describes the camp as "a vast and terrible universe" and "a kingdom of death". He describes how prisoners were forced to stand in the cold, hungry, and thirsty as they were selected for work or death. He also mentions the smell of burning flesh from the crematoria, which was overwhelming. He also describes how the prisoners were dehumanized, stripped of their clothes and hair, and given tattoos for identification.
Elie's first impression of Auschwitz after leaving Birkenau is one of shock and disbelief. He describes the camp as a "kingdom of death" where he sees the brutal reality of the Holocaust. The dehumanizing conditions, the smell of burning flesh, the selection of prisoners for work or death and the lack of humanity shock him and make him to question his faith.
To know more about Elie Wiesel click below:
https://brainly.com/question/29335189#
#SPJ4
Based on the information above which of the rolling is correct?
Answer:B
Explanation:
What did antifederalists believe the Constitution was lacking?
O Protection for individual rights
OPower for the national government
O Taxation powers
O The establishment of a bank
Given the lack of a bill of rights, the Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they believed the new national government would be overly powerful and jeopardize individual liberties.
What are Anti-Federalists?Anti-Federalists were those who favored a limited, locally focused government and opposed the ratification of the Constitution. Anti-Federalism was a political movement that opposed the establishment of a more powerful U.S. federal government in the late 18th century. It later challenged the passage of the 1787 Constitution. State governments were given more power under the previous constitution, known as the Articles of Confederation and Perpetual Union.Given the lack of a bill of rights, the Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they believed the new national government would be overly powerful and jeopardize individual liberties.Because they associated a strong government with British tyranny, many Anti-Federalists favored a weak central government. Others wished to promote democracy and were concerned about a powerful, wealthy-dominated administration. The states, in their opinion, were ceding too much power to the newly formed federal government.
To learn more about Anti-Federalists refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/857535
#SPJ1
2. William explains that the very worst thing about being a slave is
A) having to give up his hard-earned money
B) not being able to farm his own land
C) knowing his children could be taken away by another man
D) being born in different towns within a slave state
to the item above
The hardest aspect of being a slave, according to William, has been born in several places within such a slave state.
Who ended slavery?His efforts were fruitful as the bill was adopted by the House in January 1865 by a vote of 119-56. Abraham Lincoln as president issued the Joint Congress Resolution presenting the draft amendment to state governments on February 1, 1865.
Who has a noteworthy slave?F. D. Douglass (1818–1895) Douglass, a former slave, gained prominence in the anti-slavery campaign. one of the 19th century's a very well African American leaders. His book about his time as a slave and his lectures against slavery had an effect on public opinion.
To know more about slave visit:
https://brainly.com/question/4756025
#SPJ1
Read the passage, and then answer the question.
Choose the answer that best summarizes Angelina Grimké’s point.
She believes that it is acceptable to hold slaves born into slavery.
Slavery is wrong whether the person was born into slavery or was purchased from Africa.
Enslaved people prefer to be held in bondage.
Answer:
Slavery is wrong whether the person was born into slavery or was purchased from Africa.
In one or two paragraphs, give me reasons and examples why King Henry V and Joan of Arc were good leaders
The reasons and examples why King Henry V and Joan of Arc were good leaders was that they led her troops without fear and, despite suffering injuries in battle.
What made Joan of Arc such and King Henry V successful leader?The brave peasant leader of France led her troops without fear, and after receiving wounds in battle, she persisted in her quest. Her faith and bravery inspired the country and gave her people power.
Henry is an incredibly effective leader who inspires his subordinates with his intelligence, drive, and determination. He makes use of all available resources to make sure he succeeds in his objectives.
Learn more about leaders at:
https://brainly.com/question/12522775
#SPJ1
the bureaucratic structure of the ottoman empire was much more extensive than that of the ming dynasty. true false
False. The Ming Dynasty was much more bureaucratic than the Ottoman Empire.
The Ming Dynasty is often lauded for its complex and expansive bureaucracy, which was much more expansive than the Ottoman Empire's.This is evidenced by the fact that the Ming Dynasty had a variety of administrative offices and departments, including the Grand Secretariat, which was responsible for policy-making, the censorate, which was responsible for law enforcement, and the Ministry of Revenue, which was responsible for taxation. By contrast, the Ottoman Empire was much more decentralized, relying heavily on local officials to carry out its policies.
The Ming Dynasty's bureaucracy was also highly organized and efficient, with a strong focus on fiscal responsibility.This meant that the government was able to effectively manage the empire's finances and resources and effectively allocate them to various public works projects. The Ottoman Empire, on the other hand, was more lax in its fiscal policies, resulting in a lack of resources and an inability to properly allocate resources.
The Ming Dynasty's bureaucracy was also highly efficient and effective in managing the empire's political and social affairs.This allowed the dynasty to effectively manage and control its territories, promote trade and commerce, and enact laws and regulations to maintain stability and order. The Ottoman Empire, however, was much more decentralized and lacked a unified system for managing its territories and enforcing its laws, leading to a lack of control and stability.
Learn more about Ming Dynasty at: https://brainly.com/question/25528027
#SPJ4
TIME REMAINING 01:54:20 Based on A Farewell to Arms, how does Hemingway create realistic dialogue for his characters
The way that Hemingway creates a real dialogue for his characters is that characters use simple words and speak in short, clear sentences.
In A Farewell to Arms, Ernest Hemingway narrates the experiences of an American named Frederic Henry as a lieutenant in the Italian Army during World War I. Long, winding talks, hazy ideas, challenging vocabulary, and pointless conjunctions do not help Ernest Hemingway generate genuine conversation for his characters.
Ernest Hemingway's in this story tells readers that life is fragile and that they should enjoy their pleasures while they are still present. Hemingway claimed that the world's reluctance to recognise, defend, or preserve true love is nothing more than the brutal, heinous continuation of the war. As a result, Hemingway gives his characters true dialogue by having them utilise straightforward language and short, concise lines.
Complete Question:
Based on A Farewell to Arms, how does Hemingway create realistic dialogue for his characters?
The characters give long, winding speeches to express their views.
The characters use simple words and speak in short, clear sentences.
The characters reference vague ideas and use difficult language.
The characters integrate needless conjunctions to join sentences.
Read more about Hemingway on:
https://brainly.com/question/14300867
#SPJ4
so I need help its in chapter-15-the-Americans immigration & urbanization
1) Note that three reasons Immigrants leave their home countries are:
they want to work, study or join familyEscape poverty.2) Three reasons Immigrants face hardships in the United States are:
acculturation housingemployment.3) Three reasons some nativists want to restrict immigration are;
LanguageCultureCrime.What is acculturation?Acculturation is a process of social, psychological, and cultural change that results from the integration of two cultures while adapting to the society's dominant culture.
Berry (1997) [12] outlined four major kinds of acculturation strategies: integration, assimilation, separation, and marginalization. Integration is a tactic in which someone from a foreign culture absorbs the cultural norms of the nation to which they have relocated while maintaining their own culture.
Learn more about Immigration:
https://brainly.com/question/29487746
#SPJ1
What kind of economy was developed in the south?
What is the main idea of the case for reparations?
The Case for Reparations is an article composed by Ta-Nehisi Coates and distributed in The Atlantic in 2014. The article centers around redlining and lodging segregation through the eyes of individuals who have encountered it and the overwhelming impacts it has had on the African-American people group.
Reparations are the demonstration or interaction of setting things right for a wrong. As per THE Unified Countries: Satisfactory, compelling, and brief restitution is planned to advance equity by reviewing gross infringement of global basic liberties regulation or serious infringement of worldwide compassionate regulation.
Reparations allude to the various ways of reestablishing casualties after the infringement they have endured. Individual guilty parties might be requested to give restitutions since they caused the damage, yet additionally State establishments for their demonstrations overstepping global regulation or for neglecting to forestall violations.
Learn more about case for reparations:
https://brainly.com/question/30197655
#SPJ4
how did the NATO affect on the economy during the cold war?
pls real and understandable answers only , and try to be long as you can
The way that NATO affected the economy during the Cold War was increased government spending which allowed for economic growth.
How did NATO affect economies?One of the main ways that NATO affected the economy during the Cold War was by increasing military spending. As a military alliance, NATO required its member countries to maintain a certain level of military readiness and to invest in defense spending. This led to an increase in government spending on defense and a corresponding increase in government debt.
Additionally, NATO's military presence in Europe led to the creation of new jobs in the defense and aerospace industries, as well as in the construction and logistics industries. It also led to the development of new technologies and innovations in these fields.
Find out more on NATO's effects at https://brainly.com/question/20464903
#SPJ1
Please help me on this!
The question of B. how large and powerful the federal government should be divided the Federalist and Republican parties.
What divided the Federalist and Democratic - Republican parties ?The Federalist and Democratic-Republican parties were the first two political parties in the United States. They emerged during the early 1790s, with the Federalists generally supporting a strong central government and a strong national economy, while the Democratic-Republicans favored states' rights and a more agrarian-based economy.
The main issue that divided the two parties was the nature and role of the Federal government, particularly as it related to the economy, taxation and the interpretation of the constitution. The Federalists, under the leadership of Alexander Hamilton, believed in a strong central government and a strong national economy, while the Democratic-Republicans, led by Thomas Jefferson, favored states' rights and a more agrarian-based economy.
Find out more on the Federalist Party at https://brainly.com/question/3014343
#SPJ1
Who is called to back up john’s testimony? what happens?
A witness is called to back up John's testimony.
A witness is a person who can provide evidence or testimony in a legal proceeding. In this case, the witness would be called to provide additional evidence or testimony to support John's testimony. The witness would be expected to have knowledge of the events or information that John is testifying about and to be able to provide additional information that supports or corroborates John's testimony.
When a witness is called to back up John's testimony, they are typically asked questions by the attorney who called them, as well as by the opposing attorney. The witness may be asked to describe what they saw, heard, or know about the events in question, and to explain how their testimony supports or relates to John's testimony. The judge and jury will then consider the testimony of both John and the witness when evaluating the credibility and reliability of the testimony.
A witness is called to back up John's testimony when additional evidence or testimony is required to support or corroborate what John testified. The witness will be questioned by attorneys and their testimony will be considered by the judge and jury to evaluate the credibility and reliability of the testimony.
To know more about John's testimony click below:
https://brainly.com/question/1729227#
#SPJ4
Select tif correct answer from each drop-down menu.
The Chilean coup of 1973 was
one of many instances in which the United States became engaged in regime change. They practiced
y communism in the Western Hemisphere by supporting anti-Marxist leaders. Even though many of their allies in
Latin
America wore against communism, they were often still
like Chilean dictator Augusto Pinochet. Pinochet gained control of
Chile with the help of the United States, but he ruled harshly and did not bring democratic reform.
Reset
Next
Il rights reserved.
They practiced anti communism in the Western Hemisphere by supporting anti-Marxist leaders. Even though many of their allies in Latin America were against communism, they were often stood still
What was the outcome of the military coup of 1973 in Chile?There was said to be a form of coup in the year 1973 in Chile. It was called Chilean coup d'état.
It took place on 11 September 1973 in Chile. The Action of the Armed forces was said to be one that put the country under military rule. The effect of it was that Popular Unity government was said to overthrow the Death of Salvador Allende Military Junta Government.
To know more about communism visit:
https://brainly.com/question/26774879
#SPJ1
How did the builders dry the concrete the story of us
The components were lime and a volcanic ash, which together with water slowly reacted to produce a solid mass.
Why Did humans forget how do you make concrete?According to Jackson, who is collaborating with geological engineers to generate the ideal mixture, "the recipe was utterly lost." The ancient Romans created a mortar out of volcanic ash, lime, and seawater, added bits of volcanic rock to it, and then used that mortar to create concrete.
This served as the cementing substance for the more than 2,000-year-old Roman mortars and concretes as well as later construction projects in western Europe.
Thus, The components were lime and a volcanic ash.
For more information about humans forget how do you make concrete, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/13065311
#SPJ1
In what ways are the new year’s traditions of the ancient babylonians and romans similar to more modern celebrations?
Answer:
The ancient Babylonians and Romans had New Year's traditions that were similar in some ways to more modern celebrations.
The ancient Babylonians celebrated the New Year, called Akitu, in the spring around the time of the vernal equinox, which is around March. It was a 12-day festival that included religious ceremonies, feasts, and the crowning of a new king. The festival was celebrated with processions and rituals, and it was a time of renewal and new beginnings.
Similarly, many modern cultures celebrate the New Year with religious or secular ceremonies, feasts, and parties. People often make resolutions for the new year, and the celebrations mark a time of new beginnings.
The Romans also celebrated the New Year, called the Saturnalia, which was a week-long festival in December. The festival was celebrated with gift-giving, feasts, and the decorating of homes with greenery, similar to how many cultures today celebrate New Year's Eve with fireworks, parties, and decoration of houses.
In summary, the New Year's traditions of the ancient Babylonians and Romans were similar to modern celebrations in that they marked a time of new beginnings, were celebrated with feasts and parties, and included rituals such as gift-giving and decorating of homes
Explanation:
8. Which major reform regarding voting was made as a result of the progressive reform
movement?
O an amendment affecting how governors were elected
O a law regarding federal minimum voting age
O a law determining how precincts were created
an amendment that gave women the right to vote
Houston Riot?
(noint)
Answer:
determining how precincts were created
an amendment that gave women the right
Rocko paid $12.50 for 25 game tickets. Louisa paid $17.50 for 35 game tickets. What is the constant of proportionality?
Answer:
hi
Explanation:
how are you?
Answer: $0.50
Explanation:
$12.50 divided by 25=$0.50
$17.50 divided by 35=$0.50
How does his reasoning in Part II support the theoretical foundation he established in Part I?
By establishing the constitutional role, Marshall effectively establishes the Supreme Court's role in the issue under consideration.
Why limitation so important in the Marshalls view?
Limiting Congress is important because, according to Marshall, the Constitution is the foundational principle of America. What would happen if the constitution and "simplified legislation" were equal.
What was most important result of Marshall's decision in this Supreme Court case?
The court ruled that the federal government has the right and power to establish federal banks and that the states do not have the power to tax the federal government. Marshall ruled in favor of the federal government, concluding that "the power to tax includes the power to destroy."
To know more about Marshall visit here:
https://brainly.com/question/11041806
#SPJ1
In peech to the troop at tilbury what qualitie of leaderhip do you think queen Elizabeth 1 diplay ?
In her speech to the troops at Tilbury, Queen Elizabeth I displayed several qualities of leadership such as confidence, resolve, courage and inspiration.
Queen Elizabeth I displayed confidence in her ability to lead her country and her troops in the face of potential invasion. She made it clear that she was determined to defend her kingdom and her people, and that she was ready to face whatever challenges lay ahead. She also showed courage by personally visiting her troops and delivering her speech in person, rather than remaining safely behind the lines. She also showed inspiration by encouraging her troops to be brave and to stand strong against the enemy, reminding them of their duty to protect their country and their queen.
She also showed her leadership by being a symbol of unity, her speech was an excellent example of how a leader can inspire their troops, by her words and her actions, to fight for their country and their leader. She also demonstrated how a leader can be a unifying force, bringing people together in a common cause and motivating them to overcome their fears and doubts.
To know more about Queen Elizabeth I click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/10062367#
#SPJ4