Can somone help please? Thx​

In triangle ΔGHI, with ∠I measuring 90° and ∠G measuring 82°, and GH measuring 3.4 feet, the length of HI is 24.2 feet.

To find the length of HI, we can use the trigonometric function tangent (tan). In a right triangle, the tangent of an angle is equal to the ratio of the length of the side opposite the angle to the length of the side adjacent to it. In this case, the side opposite ∠G is HI, and the side adjacent to ∠G is GH. Therefore, we can set up the equation: tan(82°) = HI / GH.

Rearranging the equation to solve for HI, we have: HI = GH * tan(82°). Plugging in the given values, we get: HI = 3.4 * tan(82°). Using a calculator, we find that tan(82°) is approximately 7.115. Multiplying 3.4 by 7.115, we find that HI is approximately 24.161 feet. Rounded to the nearest tenth of a foot, the length of HI is 24.2 feet.

Learn more about tangent here:

https://brainly.com/question/10053881

#SPJ11

By substituting u = x²   and using the appropriate differential, the integral can be transformed into 3∫(669 sin(u)) du, which can be further evaluated.

The given expression, 6∫(669x sin(x²)) dx, can be simplified using the substitution u = x² and 2x dx = du, which implies that x dx = (1/2) du. By substituting these values, the integral becomes 6∫(1/2)(669 sin(u)) du.

When x = 0, u = 0, and when x = 4, u = 16.

Thus, the integral can be rewritten as 6(1/2) ∫(669 sin(u)) du from 0 to 16.

Simplifying further, we get 3∫(669 sin(u)) du from 0 to 16, which evaluates to 3[-669 cos(u)] from 0 to 16, resulting in a final answer of -669[cos(16) - cos(0)].

Learn more about integral

brainly.com/question/31433890

#SPJ11

The equilibrium point (1,1) in the system x′ = 2(x − y)y, y′ = xy - 2 is a(n) stable spiral.

To determine the type of equilibrium point, we first linearize the system around the point (1,1) by finding the Jacobian matrix:

J(x,y) = | ∂x′/∂x  ∂x′/∂y | = |  2y     -2y  |
        | ∂y′/∂x  ∂y′/∂y |    |  y      x   |

Evaluate the Jacobian at the equilibrium point (1,1):

J(1,1) = |  2  -2 |
        |  1   1  |

Next, find the eigenvalues of the Jacobian matrix. The characteristic equation is:

(2 - λ)(1 - λ) - (-2)(1) = λ² - 3λ + 4 = 0

Solve for the eigenvalues:

λ₁ = (3 + √7i)/2, λ₂ = (3 - √7i)/2

Since the eigenvalues have positive real parts and nonzero imaginary parts, the equilibrium point at (1,1) is a stable spiral. This means that trajectories near the point spiral towards it over time.

To know more about Jacobian matrix click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/31396330#

#SPJ11

Rounding to three decimal places, the probability is approximately 0.007.

To find the probability that the first two adults get news from television and the third gets news from the newspaper, we need to use the multiplication rule for independent events.
The probability of selecting an adult who gets news from television on the first draw is 13/75, since there are 13 adults who get news from television out of a total of 75 adults.
Assuming the first draw is an adult who gets news from television, there are now 12 adults who get news from television out of a total of 74 adults.

So the probability of selecting another adult who gets news from television on the second draw, given that the first draw was an adult who gets news from television, is 12/74.
Assuming the first two draws are adults who get news from television, there are now 14 adults who get news from a newspaper out of a total of 73 adults.

So the probability of selecting an adult who gets news from a newspaper on the third draw, given that the first two draws were adults who get news from television, is 14/73.
Therefore, the probability that the first two adults get news from television and the third gets news from the newspaper is:
(13/75) * (12/74) * (14/73) = 0.0067
For similar question on probability:

https://brainly.com/question/14210034

#SPJ11

(a) To plot the point (4, π/3, -3) in cylindrical coordinates, we start by drawing the z-axis and rotating counterclockwise by π/3 to locate the projection of the point onto the xy-plane. Then we draw a circle with radius 4 centered at the projection and extend a vertical line downwards by 3 units to find the point in space.

To find the rectangular coordinates, we use the formulas x = r cos θ and y = r sin θ, where r is the radius and θ is the angle in the xy-plane measured counterclockwise from the positive x-axis. Thus, x = 4 cos(π/3) = 2 and y = 4 sin(π/3) = 2√3. The z-coordinate is already given as -3, so the rectangular coordinates of the point are (2, 2√3, -3).

(b) To plot the point (9, -π/2, 7) in cylindrical coordinates, we start by drawing the z-axis and rotating counterclockwise by π/2 to locate the projection of the point onto the xy-plane. Then we draw a circle with radius 9 centered at the projection and extend a vertical line upwards by 7 units to find the point in space.
To find the rectangular coordinates, we use the same formulas as before. However, since the angle in the xy-plane is now -π/2, we have x = 9 cos(-π/2) = 0 and y = 9 sin(-π/2) = -9. The z-coordinate is already given as 7, so the rectangular coordinates of the point are (0, -9, 7).

To know more about coordinates visit:

https://brainly.com/question/16634867

#SPJ11

The true inequalities in the number line are:

0 < √0.9, √0.9 < 0.9

√0.9 < 1, 0.9 > √0.9 < 1

To plot √0.9 on the number line, we need to find its approximate value.

√0.9 is between 0 and 1 because 0.9 is greater than 0 but less than 1. However, it is closer to 1 than 0.

So, we can represent √0.9 as a point on the number line between 0 and 1, closer to 1.

Now let's analyze the given inequalities:

0 < √0.9: This inequality is true because √0.9 is greater than 0.

√0.9 < 0.9: This inequality is true because √0.9 is less than 0.9.

√0.9 < 1: This inequality is true because √0.9 is less than 1.

√0.9 > √1: This inequality is false because √0.9 is less than √1.

0.9 > √0.9 < 1: This inequality is true because √0.9 is less than 1 and greater than 0.9.

So, the true inequalities are:

0 < √0.9

√0.9 < 0.9

√0.9 < 1

0.9 > √0.9 < 1

Learn more about inequality here:

https://brainly.com/question/28823603

#SPJ11

Answer:

v

Step-by-step explanation:

Factors related to cause and effect is not one of the things the relative frequency (Rf) of z-scores allows us to calculate for corresponding raw scores. The correct answer is a) Factors related to cause and effect.

The relative frequency (Rf) of z-scores is a statistical tool that calculates the probability of obtaining a certain raw score or a score more extreme than that. It allows for inferences to be made about the population from which the sample was drawn and for comparisons to be made between variables. However, Rf does not provide information on factors related to cause and effect, as it cannot establish cause-and-effect relationships between variables. It is useful in analyzing data in the context of a normal distribution and calculating the frequency of occurrence of certain scores in a given population. Therefore the correct answer is a) Factors related to cause and effect.

Learn more about relative frequency (Rf) :

https://brainly.com/question/29267583

#SPJ11

When data is converted to ranks, the correlation obtained is the Spearman correlation. It assesses the strength and direction of the monotonic relationship between two variables, meaning that it can capture non-linear relationships as well.

The Pearson correlation measures the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables, assuming they have a normal distribution. However, when data is not normally distributed, it may be converted to ranks, which allows for a non-parametric correlation measure to be used. The Spearman correlation is a non-parametric measure of correlation that uses the ranks of the data rather than the actual values.

In addition to the Spearman correlation, there are other non-parametric correlation measures that can be used when data is converted to ranks. The point-biserial correlation is used when one variable is dichotomous and the other is continuous and ranked. The phi coefficient is used when both variables are dichotomous. However, even when data is converted to ranks, the correlation measure is still commonly referred to as the Pearson correlation, as it is the same formula used with ranked data as with non-ranked data. However, it is important to recognize that the interpretation and assumptions of the correlation measure may differ depending on the type of data used.

To know more about correlation  visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/30116167

#SPJ11

x = 5pi/6 is not in the interval [0, pi/2]

Starting with the given equation:

4 cos x - 8 sin x cos x = 0

We can factor out 4 cos x:

4 cos x (1 - 2 sin x) = 0

So either cos x = 0 or (1 - 2 sin x) = 0.

If cos x = 0, then x = pi/2 since we're only considering the interval [0, pi/2].

If 1 - 2 sin x = 0, then sin x = 1/2, which means x = pi/6 or x = 5pi/6 in the interval [0, pi/2].

So the two solutions in the interval [0, pi/2] are x = pi/2 and x = pi/6.

That x = 5pi/6 is not in the interval [0, pi/2].

for such more question on  interval

https://brainly.com/question/22008756

#SPJ11

The given equation is 4 cos x - 8 sin x cos x = 0. To find the solutions in the interval [0, pi/2], we need to solve for x.
Find the solutions within the given interval. Equation: 4 cos x - 8 sin x cos x = 0

First, let's factor out the common term, which is cos x:

cos x (4 - 8 sin x) = 0

Now, we have two cases to find the solutions:

Case 1: cos x = 0
In the interval [0, π/2], cos x is never equal to 0, so there is no solution for this case.

Case 2: 4 - 8 sin x = 0
Now, we'll solve for sin x:

8 sin x = 4
sin x = 4/8
sin x = 1/2

We know that in the interval [0, π/2], sin x = 1/2 has one solution, which is x = π/6.

So, in the given interval [0, π/2], the equation has only one solution: x = π/6.

To learn more about factor : brainly.com/question/14209188

#SPJ11

Plugging in the value of w = 3.156 rad/s, we can calculate the maximum Displacement.

To find the positive angular frequency w that leads to maximum practical resonance, we can solve the given equation for steady-state response by setting the input force equal to the damping force.

The given equation represents a damped mass-spring system with an oscillating force. The equation of motion for this system can be written as:0.72x'' + 1.54x' + 8.7x = 3.3cos(wt)

To determine the angular frequency w that leads to maximum practical resonance, we need to find the value of w that results in the maximum amplitude of the steady-state response.

The steady-state solution for this equation can be expressed as:

x(t) = X*cos(wt - φ)

where X is the amplitude and φ is the phase angle.

To find the maximum displacement (maximum amplitude), we can take the derivative of the steady-state solution with respect to time and set it equal to zero:

dx(t)/dt = -Xwsin(wt - φ) = 0

This condition implies that sin(wt - φ) = 0, which means wt - φ must be an integer multiple of π.

Since we are interested in finding the maximum practical resonance, we want the amplitude to be as large as possible. This occurs when the angular frequency w is equal to the natural frequency of the system.

The natural frequency of the system can be calculated using the formula:

ωn = sqrt(k/m)where k is the spring constant and m is the mass.

Given that the mass is 0.7 kg and the spring constant is 8.7 N/m, we can calculate the natural frequency:

ωn = sqrt(8.7 / 0.7) ≈ 3.156 rad/s

Therefore, the positive angular frequency w that leads to maximum practical resonance is approximately 3.156 rad/s.

To calculate the maximum displacement (maximum amplitude) of the mass at practical resonance, we need to find the amplitude X. Given the steady-state equation: x(t) = X*cos(wt - φ)

We know that at practical resonance, the input force is equal to the damping force:3.3cos(wt) = 1.54x' + 8.7x

By solving this equation for the amplitude X, we can find the maximum displacement: X = (3.3 / sqrt((8.7 - w^2)^2 + (1.54 * w)^2))

Plugging in the value of w = 3.156 rad/s, we can calculate the maximum displacement.

To know more about Displacement.

https://brainly.com/question/1581502

#SPJ11

The maximum displacement is:x_max = 0.695 cos(-0.298) = 0.646 m (approx)

The steady-state solution for the given damped mass-spring system is of the form:

x(t) = A cos(wt - phi)

where A is the amplitude of oscillation, w is the angular frequency, and phi is the phase angle.

To find the angular frequency that leads to maximum practical resonance, we need to find the value of w that makes the amplitude A as large as possible. The amplitude A is given by:

A = F0 / sqrt((k - mw^2)^2 + (cw)^2)

where F0 is the amplitude of the oscillating force, k is the spring constant, m is the mass, and c is the damping coefficient.

To maximize A, we need to minimize the denominator of the above expression. We can write the denominator as:

(k - mw^2)^2 + (cw)^2 = k^2 - 2kmw^2 + m^2w^4 + c^2w^2

Taking the derivative of the above expression with respect to w and setting it to zero, we get:

-4kmw + 2m^2w^3 + 2cw = 0

Simplifying and solving for w, we get:

w = sqrt(k/m) / sqrt(2) = sqrt(8.7/0.7) / sqrt(2) = 3.16 rad/s (approx)

This is the value of w that leads to maximum practical resonance.

To find the steady-state solution at practical resonance, we can substitute w = 3.16 rad/s into the equation of motion:

0.7x'' + 1.54x' + 8.7x = 3.3 cos(3.16t)

The steady-state solution is of the form:

x(t) = A cos(3.16t - phi)

where A and phi can be determined by matching coefficients with the right-hand side of the above equation. We can write:

x(t) = Acos(3.16t - phi) = Re[Ae^(i(3.16t - phi))]

where Re denotes the real part of a complex number. The amplitude A can be found from:

A = F0 / sqrt((k - mw^2)^2 + (cw)^2) = 3.3 / sqrt((8.7 - 0.7(3.16)^2)^2 + (1.54(3.16))^2) = 0.695

The maximum displacement occurs when cos(3.16t - phi) = 1, which happens at t = 0. Therefore, the maximum displacement is:

x_max = A cos(-phi) = 0.695 cos(-phi)

The phase angle phi can be found from:

tan(phi) = cw / (k - mw^2) = 1.54 / (8.7 - 0.7(3.16)^2) = 0.308

phi = atan(0.308) = 0.298 rad

Know more about maximum displacement here:

https://brainly.com/question/14150511

#SPJ11

(a) The probability that a person owns fewer than 3 calculators is 0.95.

(b) The expected number of calculators that a person owns is 1.4.

(c) The expected value of X (the number of calculators a person owns) is 1.4.

(d) The standard deviation for the number of calculators a person owns is 0.8.

(a) To find the probability that a person owns fewer than 3 calculators, we need to calculate the cumulative probability up to X = 2. This includes the probabilities P(X = 0), P(X = 1), and P(X = 2). Adding these probabilities together, we have 0.15 + 0.40 + 0.40 = 0.95. Therefore, the probability that a person owns fewer than 3 calculators is 0.95.

(b) To find the expected number of calculators that a person owns, we multiply each possible number of calculators by its respective probability and sum them up. So, we have (0 × 0.15) + (1 ×0.40) + (2 × 0.40) + (3 × 0.05) = 1.4. Therefore, the expected number of calculators that a person owns is 1.4.

(c) The expected value of X, denoted E[X], represents the average number of calculators that a person owns. In this case, we have already calculated E[X] in part (b), which is 1.4.

(d) The standard deviation of X, denoted as σX, measures the spread or variability of the number of calculators a person owns. To calculate it, we need to find the variance of X and then take the square root. The variance of X is calculated as the sum of each value of (X - E[X]) squared multiplied by its respective probability. So, we have [tex](0 - 1.4)^{2}[/tex] ×0.15 + [tex](1 - 1.4)^{2}[/tex]× 0.40 +[tex](2 - 1.4)^{2}[/tex] × 0.40 + [tex](3 - 1.4)^{2}[/tex] × 0.05 = 0.8. Taking the square root of the variance, we find that the standard deviation for the number of calculators a person owns is 0.8.

Learn more about standard deviation here:

https://brainly.com/question/13498201

#SPJ11

With a mean of 20 inches and a standard deviation of 2.6 inches, the probability can be calculated as P(z > 0), which is approximately 0.5.

To find the probability that a given infant is longer than 20 inches, we need to use the normal distribution. The given information provides the mean (20 inches) and the standard deviation (2.6 inches) of the length of newborn babies.

In order to calculate the probability, we need to convert the value of 20 inches into a standardized z-score. The z-score formula is given by (x - μ) / σ, where x is the observed value, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

Substituting the given values, we get (20 - 20) / 2.6 = 0.

Next, we find the area under the normal curve to the right of the z-score of 0. This represents the probability that a given infant is longer than 20 inches.

Using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator, we find that the area to the right of 0 is approximately 0.5.

Therefore, the probability that a given infant is longer than 20 inches is approximately 0.5, or 50%.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/32117953

#SPJ11

There are 252 distinct orders in which the panel can be seated if two people of the same party are considered identical.

We can solve this problem by first counting the number of distinct ways to arrange the Democrats and Socialists, and then multiplying by the number of ways to arrange the Independent in the remaining spots.

First, let's consider the Democrats and Socialists. We need to find the number of distinct ways to arrange 5 D's and 5 S's, where two people of the same party are considered identical. This is equivalent to finding the number of distinct ways to arrange the letters in the word "DDDDSSSSSS", which is given by:

10

!

5

!

5

!

=

252

5!5!

10!

​

=252

This is the number of distinct ways to arrange the Democrats and Socialists. Next, we need to arrange the Independent in the remaining spot. There is only 1 Independent, so there is only 1 way to do this.

Therefore, the total number of distinct orders is:

252

×

1

=

252

252×1=252

Learn more about equivalent at: brainly.com/question/25197597

#SPJ11

The integral ∫csc^2(x) dx can be rewritten in terms of g(x) as F(g(x)) - 2/7 ∫csc(g(x)/7) cot(g(x)/7) dx, where F(g(x)) is the antiderivative of csc^2(g(x)/7).

Let's start by substituting g(x) into the function f(x):

f(g(x)) = csc^2(g(x)/7)

Next, we can use the chain rule to find the derivative of f(g(x)):

f'(g(x)) = -2csc(g(x)/7) cot(g(x)/7) / 7

Using the substitution u = g(x), we can rewrite the integral in terms of g(x) as follows:

∫csc^2(x) dx = ∫f(g(x)) dx = ∫f(u) du = F(u) + C

Substituting back in for u, we get:

∫csc^2(x) dx = F(g(x)) + C

Using the derivative of f(g(x)) that we found earlier, we can substitute it into the integral:

∫csc^2(x) dx = -2/7 ∫csc(g(x)/7) cot(g(x)/7) dx

Therefore, the integral in terms of g(x) and the antiderivative F(g(x)) is:

∫csc^2(x) dx = F(g(x)) - 2/7 ∫csc(g(x)/7) cot(g(x)/7) dx

To know more about integral,

https://brainly.com/question/1383192

#SPJ11

Therefore, x and y for the indefinite integral are not independent, even though they are uncorrelated.

To show that x and y are uncorrelated, we need to compute their indefinite integraland show that it is zero:

Cov(x, y) = E(xy) - E(x)E(y)

We can compute E(x) and E(y) as follows:

E(x) = E(cos) = ∫(cos*f( )d ) = ∫(cos(1/2π)*d ) = 0

E(y) = E(sin) = ∫(sin*f( )d ) = ∫(sin(1/2π)*d ) = 0

where f( ) is the probability density function of , which is a uniform distribution over the range (0, 2π).

Next, we compute E(xy):

E(xy) = E(cossin) = ∫(cossinf( )d ) = ∫(cossin(1/2π)*d )

Since cos*sin is an odd function, we have:

∫(cossin(1/2π)*d ) = 0

Therefore, Cov(x, y) = E(xy) - E(x)E(y) = 0 - 0*0 = 0.

Hence, x and y are uncorrelated.

To show that x and y are not independent, we need to find P(x, y) and show that it does not factorize into P(x)P(y):

P(x, y) = P(cos, sin) = P( ) = (1/2π)

Since P(x, y) is constant over the entire range of (cos, sin), we can see that P(x, y) does not depend on either x or y, i.e., it does not factorize into P(x)P(y).

To know more about indefinite integral,

https://brainly.com/question/29133144

#SPJ11

Using the formula of conditional probability, the probability that a student buys lunch given that they ride the bus is approximately 81.25%. So,  81.25% is the right answer.

To find the probability that a student buys lunch given that they ride the bus, we can use conditional probability.

Let's denote the following events:

A: Student buys lunch

B: Student rides the bus

We are given:

P(B) = 80% = 0.80 (probability that a student rides the bus)

P(A) = 75% = 0.75 (probability that a student buys lunch)

P(A|B) = 65% = 0.65 (probability that a student buys lunch given that they ride the bus)

Using the concept of conditional probability

Probability of a student buying lunch and riding the bus = 65%

Probability of a student riding the bus = 80%

Probability of a student buying lunch given that they ride the bus = (Probability of a student buying lunch and riding the bus) / (Probability of a student riding the bus) = 65% / 80% = 0.8125 = 81.25%

For more such question on conditional probability

https://brainly.com/question/10739997

#SPJ11

The limit exists, and the limit of the function as (x, y)→(0, 0) is 0.

To find the limit of the given function as (x, y)→(0, 0), we need to consider the function and the terms you mentioned, "limit" and "exists."

The given function is:

f(x, y) = [tex](x^2 * y^2) / (x^2 * y^2 + 16 - 4)[/tex]

We want to find the limit as (x, y)→(0, 0):

lim (x, y)→(0, 0) f(x, y)

Step 1: Check if the function is continuous at (0,0)

When x = 0 and y = 0:

f(0, 0) = [tex](0^2 * 0^2) / (0^2 * 0^2 + 16 - 4)[/tex]

f(0, 0) = 0 / (0 + 12)

f(0, 0) = 0

Since the function is defined at (0, 0), it is continuous at this point.

Step 2: Analyze the limit

As (x, y) approach (0, 0), the numerator [tex](x^2 * y^2)[/tex] also approaches 0. The denominator [tex](x^2 * y^2 + 16 - 4)[/tex]approaches 12. Thus, we have:

lim (x, y)→(0, 0) f(x, y) = 0 / 12 = 0

So, the limit exists, and the limit of the function as (x, y)→(0, 0) is 0.

Learn more about limit here:

https://brainly.com/question/30532698

#SPJ11

Answer:

The span {1, 2} consists of all possible linear combinations of the vectors [1, 0] and [0, 2]. Therefore, any vector in this span can be written as:

a[1, 0] + b[0, 2] = [a, 2b]

Here are five vectors in the span {1, 2} along with their corresponding weights on 1 and 2:

[2, 4] = 2[1, 0] + 2[0, 2]

[3, -6] = 3[1, 0] - 3[0, 2]

[-5, 10] = -5[1, 0] + 5[0, 2]

[0, 0] = 0[1, 0] + 0[0, 2]

[1, 1] = 1[1, 0] + 0.5[0, 2]

To know more about linear refer here

https://brainly.com/question/15830007#

#SPJ11

Any permutation can be achieved by performing a series of transpositions, where you repeatedly swap elements until all objects are in their correct positions.

A permutation is an arrangement of n objects in a specific order, while a transposition is a simple swap of two elements in a permutation.

To show that any permutation can be achieved by a product of transpositions, let's follow these steps:

Step 1: Consider a permutation of n objects, where at least one element is not in its desired position.

Step 2: Identify the first element that is not in its correct position. This element should be at position i but should be in position j.

Step 3: Perform a transposition by swapping the element in position i with the element in position j. Now, the element that was originally in position i is in its correct position.

Step 4: Repeat steps 2 and 3 for the remaining n-1 objects, excluding the element that has been placed in its correct position.

Step 5: Continue this process until all elements are in their correct positions. At this point, you have achieved the desired permutation by performing a series of transpositions (swaps).

In summary, any permutation can be achieved by performing a series of transpositions, where you repeatedly swap elements until all objects are in their correct positions.

Learn more about permutation here:

https://brainly.com/question/31369352

#SPJ11

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

32.00 increased by 25% is 40.00

The increase is 8.00

The steps are explained below.

Factorization of the given polynomial to find the product is as follows;

(x² + 3x + 2)/(x² + 6x + 5) = (x + 1)(x + 2)/(x + 1)(x + 5)

(x² + 7x + 10)/(x² + 4x + 4) = (x + 2)(x + 5)/(x + 2)(x + 2)

Expressing the product in terms of the factors

(x² + 3x + 2)/(x ^ 2 + 6x + 5) × (x² + 7x + 10)/(x² + 4x + 4) = (x + 2)(x + 5)/(x + 2)(x + 2) × (x + 1)(x + 2)/(x + 1)(x + 5)

The steps arranged in the order in which they would be performed are;

First step;

(x² + 3x + 2)/(x² + 6x + 5) × (x² + 7x + 10)/(x² + 4x + 4)

Second step (factorizing) =

(x + 1)(x + 2)/(x + 1)(x + 5) × (x + 2)(x + 5)/(x + 2)(x + 2)

Third step (dividing out common terms) =

(x+5)/(x+2) × (x+2)/(x+5)

Fourth step (rearranging and removing terms that cancel each other)

= 1

Learn more here about factorization:

brainly.com/question/12723898

#SPJ1

We get two different answers for fg depending on the method used to compute the convolution. Using a change of variables, we get fg = 1/√(2π), while using integration by parts, we get f°g = ∞.

Since both functions f!(t) and g(t) are equal to h(t), their convolution f°g can be computed as follows:

f°g = ∫[0,∞] f(τ)g(t-τ) dτ

= ∫[0,∞] h(τ)h(t-τ) dτ

Method 1: Change of Variables

To compute the convolution using a change of variables, let u = t' and v = t - t'. Then, τ = u and t = u + v, and we have:

f°g = ∫∫[D] h(u)h(u+v) dudv

where D is the region of integration corresponding to the domain of u and v. Since the limits of integration are 0 to ∞ for both u and v, we can write:

f°g = ∫[0,∞] ∫[0,∞] h(u)h(u+v) dudv

Using the convolution theorem, we know that f°g is equal to the Fourier transform of H(f), where H(f) is the Fourier transform of h(t). Since h(t) is a constant function, H(f) is a Dirac delta function, given by:

H(f) = 1/√(2π) δ(f)

where δ(f) is the Dirac delta function. Therefore, we have:

f°g = Fourier^-1{H(f)} = Fourier^-1{1/√(2π) δ(f)} = 1/√(2π)

Method 2: Integration by Parts

To compute the convolution using integration by parts, we have:

f°g = ∫[0,∞] h(τ)h(t-τ) dτ

= h(t) ∫[0,∞] h(τ-t) dτ (using a change of variables)

= h(t) ∫[0,∞] h(u) du (since h is a constant function)

= h(t) [u]0^∞

= h(t) [∞ - 0]

= ∞

Learn more about integral function at https://brainly.com/question/29738170

#SPJ11

The correct equation is,

⇒ 8(x + 6) = 144

Now, We can start building this equation by making everything equal to 144 since the problem is representing the total number of apples:

? = 144

Next, we don't know how many apples are in each basket, so we can represent it with a variable, x.

Since 6 apples are added to each basket we will simply add 6 to the "x" amount of apples in each basket:

x + 6 = 144

Lastly, according to the scenario, we have 8 baskets, each holding "x" amount of apples plus the extra 6 that was added, so it will be multiplied:

8(x + 6) = 144

Thus, The correct equation is,

8(x + 6) = 144

Learn more about the mathematical expression visit:

brainly.com/question/1859113

#SPJ1

To derive the trigonometric Fourier series from the complex exponential series, we can start with the complex exponential Fourier series: The trigonometric Fourier series is f(x) = a0/2 + Σ[cn e^(inx)]

where cn = (an - ibn)/2.

f(x) = a0/2 + Σ(an cos(nx) + bn sin(nx))

where a0/2 is the average value of f(x), and an and bn are the Fourier coefficients given by:

an = (1/π) ∫f(x)cos(nx)dx

bn = (1/π) ∫f(x)sin(nx)dx

We can rewrite the trigonometric terms in terms of complex exponentials as follows:

cos(nx) = (e^(inx) + e^(-inx))/2

sin(nx) = (e^(inx) - e^(-inx))/(2i)

Substituting these expressions into the complex exponential Fourier series, we get:

f(x) = a0/2 + Σ[(an + ibn)(e^(inx) + e^(-inx))/2]

where ibn = bn/i.

We can simplify this expression as follows:

f(x) = a0/2 + Σ[cn e^(inx)]

where cn = (an - ibn)/2.

This is the trigonometric Fourier series, which expresses the function f(x) as a sum of complex exponential terms with real coefficients. We can write this more explicitly as:

f(x) = a0/2 + Σ[cn (cos(nx) + i sin(nx))]

which is the same as:

f(x) = a0/2 + Σ[cn cos(nx)] + i Σ[cn sin(nx)]

So, to derive the trigonometric Fourier series from the complex exponential series, we simply substitute the complex exponential expressions for cos(nx) and sin(nx), and simplify the resulting expression to obtain the coefficients cn.

https://brainly.com/question/31959354

#SPJ11

For "vector-field" F(x,y,z) = 4eˣ sin(y), 2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z), 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x);

(a) curl is -2[tex]e^{y}[/tex]cos(z)i - 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]cos(x)j - 4eˣ cos(y)k.

(b) divergence is 4eˣ sin(y) + 2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z) + 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x).

The vector-filed is given as : F(x,y,z) = 4eˣ sin(y), 2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z), 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x);

Part(a) : The curl of the given vector-field can be written in determinant form as :

Curl(F) = [tex]\left|\begin{array}{ccc}i&j&k\\\frac{d}{dx} &\frac{d}{dy}&\frac{d}{dz}\\4e^{x}Siny &2e^{y}Sinz&3e^{z}Sinx\end{array}\right|[/tex];

= i{d/dy(3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x)) - d/dz(2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z))} - j{d/dx(3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x) - d/dz(4eˣ sin(y))} + k{d/dx(2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z)) - d/dy(4eˣ sin(y))};

= -2[tex]e^{y}[/tex]cos(z)i - 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]cos(x)j - 4eˣ cos(y)k.

Part (b) : The divergence of the vector-"F" can be written as :

div.F = [i×d/dx + j×d/dy + k×d/dz]×F,

Substituting the values,

We get,

= [i×d/dx + j×d/dy + k×d/dz] . {4eˣ sin(y), 2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z), 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x)},

= d/dx (4eˣ sin(y)) + d/dy (2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z)) + d/dz (3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x)),

On simplifying further,

We get,

Therefore, the Divergence = 4eˣ sin(y) + 2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z) + 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x).

Learn more about Vector Filed here

https://brainly.com/question/7964566

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

Consider the vector field. F(x,y,z) = 4eˣ sin(y), 2[tex]e^{y}[/tex] sin(z), 3[tex]e^{z}[/tex]sin(x);

(a) Find the curl of the vector field.

(b) Find the divergence of the vector field.

there is no equations

Hey There!

Step-by-step explanation:

Which of the matrices are equal?

Two matrices are said to be equal if: Both the matrices are of the same order i.e., they have the same number of rows and columns A m × n = B m × n .

Answer: Oui, vous pouvez le factoriser parfaitement

Step-by-step explanation:

x^2 + 8x + 64

ajouter et soustraire (b/2a)^2

x^2+8x+64+16-16

factoriser le trinôme carré parfait : x^2 + 8x + 16

(x+4)^2 + 64 - 16

réponse finale:

48 + (x+4)^2

The optimal solution of the given linear program is (x, y) = (2, 1).

How to solve linear programming problems?

To solve the linear program, we first plot the feasible region determined by the constraints:

We can rewrite the second constraint as y >= (4 - Ax)/2.

Next, we plot the lines 3x - 4y = 12 and Ax + 2y = 4 - 2x and shade the appropriate regions:

We can see that the feasible region is bounded, so we can find the optimal solution by evaluating the objective function C at each of the corner points of the feasible region.

The corner points are:

Evaluating C at each corner point, we get:

Thus, the optimal solution is at (2, 1) with a minimum value of C = 11.

Learn more about Linear program

brainly.com/question/30763902

#SPJ11

A pile of 55 keyboard boxes will be approximately 1983.08 cm tall.

To determine the total height of a pile of 55 keyboard boxes, we need to first calculate the height of a single box and then multiply it by 55.

Given that a single box is 3/2 cm thick, we need to know the dimensions of the box to calculate its height. If we assume that the box has a standard width and length of, say, 30 cm and 20 cm respectively, we can calculate its height using the Pythagorean theorem.

The Pythagorean theorem states that the square of the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the sum of the squares of the other two sides. In this case, the hypotenuse is the height of the box, and the other two sides are the width and length.

So, we have:

height^2 = width^2 + length^2

height^2 = 30^2 + 20^2

height^2 = 900 + 400

height^2 = 1300

height = sqrt(1300)

height = 36.0555... cm (rounded to 3 decimal places)

Therefore, the height of a single keyboard box is approximately 36.056 cm.

To find the height of a pile of 55 keyboard boxes, we can simply multiply the height of a single box by 55:

height of pile = 36.056 cm x 55

height of pile = 1983.08 cm

Learn more about Pythagorean theorem at: brainly.com/question/14930619

#SPJ11