Answer:
Economic: U.S we're democracy so their economy were centrate in private bussinesses and Soviet Union we're focused upon equity of wealth and it's balance distribución among people.
Ideology: US: Democracy ideologies while Soviet Union had dictatorship ideologies
Political: U.S Capitalism while Soviet Union were Communism.
why were immigrants from germany and ireland feared and hated?
Immigrants from Germany and Ireland faced fear and hatred due to anti-German sentiment during World War I and prejudice based on religion and economic competition, respectively.
German immigrants faced fear and hatred during World War I due to anti-German sentiment. As the United States was at war with Germany, German immigrants were viewed as potential enemies and subjected to discrimination, including surveillance and restrictions on their rights. On the other hand, Irish immigrants faced prejudice based on their Catholic faith and economic competition.
Being predominantly Protestant, the native-born population saw the Irish immigrants as a threat. Additionally, the Irish immigrants often competed with native-born Americans for jobs, leading to economic tensions and further hostility.
These cultural, religious, and economic factors contributed to the fear and hatred experienced by immigrants from Germany and Ireland during different historical periods in the United States.
Learn more about Immigrants click here :brainly.com/question/24795942
#SPJ11
This map would be MOST helpful in understanding which of these situations?
A) The effects of the Great Depression.
B) The impact of the Dust Bowl.
C) The end of the frontier.
D) The expansion of population.
This map supports each of these statements except one. Which statement is NOT supported by this map?
A) New Mexico was not impacted severe wind erosion.
B) Northern Texas felt the impact of wind erosion.
C) Six states felt the impact of severe wind erosion.
D) Erosion became less of a problem the further east one traveled.
1) This map helps in understanding the impact of the Dust Bowl. The Dust Bowl was a major environmental disaster that happened in the United States during the Great Depression of the 1930s.
A combination of causes, including drought, over-farming, and poor land management techniques, contributed to catastrophic soil erosion and dust storms. The Dust Bowl devastated the United States' Great Plains region, causing major harm to agricultural productivity, human health, and the environment.
The Dust Bowl had a disastrous effect. Millions of acres of productive land were devastated, resulting in catastrophic crop failure, food shortages, and economic misery. Dust storms were widespread, enveloping entire towns and cities in huge clouds of dust and debris. The dust also caused respiratory ailments and other health issues, which resulted in a considerable increase in fatality rates.
The Dust Bowl also caused widespread migration, with millions of individuals fleeing devastated areas in pursuit of better chances elsewhere.
2) This statement that doesn't support with the map is New Mexico was not impacted severe wind erosion. Because it is clearly shown in the map that the North eastern part of the New Mexico was affected with Severe wind erosion.
Learn more about Dust Bowl:
https://brainly.com/question/27880854
#SPJ1
4
Why is it important to consider the historical context surrounding an event
when making a historical interpretation?
A. A conclusion that does not consider context is a generalization
rather than an interpretation.
B. Events happening at the same time might have influenced one
another.
C. Every historical interpretation must consider political and social
consequences of an event.
D. Historical interpretations are only valid if they are written in a
similar context as the event.
in the athenian democracy, personal immortality was important only to the extent that it affected the survival of the _____.
In the Athenian democracy, personal immortality was important only to the extent that it affected the survival of the polis, or the city-state.
What was the extent of personal immortality?Athenian democracy, which flourished in ancient Athens, valued the collective well-being and prosperity of the city-state above individual aspirations. The citizens of Athens believed that their personal immortality was closely tied to the perpetuity and success of their polis.
The survival and flourishing of the polis were of paramount importance, as it ensured the continuation of their democratic system, cultural identity, and way of life. Individuals' actions and contributions were seen as crucial for the preservation and growth of the city-state, and personal immortality held meaning insofar as it impacted the long-term survival and success of the Athenian community as a whole.
To learn more about Athenian democracy, visit
brainly.com/question/30127600
#SPJ11
How did agricultural subsidies change after the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) was found to be unconstitutional in 1936?
A) Under the AAA, subsidies were used to pay farmers to destroy product or leave fields barren unlike today where they are used to produce extra food for market.
B) Under the AAA, subsidies were not used unlike today where they are used to heavily fund farmers to grow specifically needed crops.
C) Under the AAA, subsidies were used to pay small farmers where today they are used to fund large corporate entities.
D) Under the AAA, subsidies were used to collectivize farms into large entities where today they are used to fund small independent farmers.
Under the AAA, subsidies were used to pay farmers to destroy products or leave fields barren unlike today where they are used to produce extra food for the market, is the correct statement. So the answer is option A.
In 1933, Congress established the Agricultural Adjustment Act (AAA) to assist farmers by giving subsidies to cut production and boost crop prices. However, the AAA was declared unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1936. As a result, the government enacted the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, which rewarded farmers with incentives for growing crops rather than destroying them. The new act also includes provisions for soil protection and other farm productivity and income-boosting initiatives.
Option A is hence the proper statement. The AAA did offer farmers with subsidies, but these payments were used to bribe farmers to destroy crops or leave fields fallow, reducing supply and raising prices. This was considered as a solution to the problem of overproduction, which had resulted in declining crop prices and economic troubles for many farmers during the Great Depression.
However, after the AAA was declared unconstitutional, the government shifted its focus to providing subsidies for production rather than destruction, as stated in Option A.
Learn more about Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938:
https://brainly.com/question/4810146
#SPJ1
“our ability as a nation to ____ and _____”.
Our ability as a nation to adapt to technological changes and advancements will be critical for our future success.
Technology has rapidly transformed the way we live, work, and communicate, and its impact is only expected to grow in the coming years. In light of this, the ability of a nation to adapt to technological changes and advancements is critical for its future success.
For instance, the rise of automation and artificial intelligence has the potential to fundamentally change the nature of work, with some jobs being automated and new ones created. The nation that is best able to adapt to this new reality, by re-skilling its workforce and investing in education and training, will be better positioned to succeed in the global economy. Similarly, the development of new technologies such as renewable energy, biotechnology, and quantum computing could have far-reaching implications for many industries.
---------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"Our ability as a nation to adapt to technological ____________ and _____________ will be critical for our future success."---------
To know more about technological , click here
https://brainly.com/question/31118746
#SPJ1
mikhail gorbachev was leonid brezhnev's immediate successor.T/F
False. Mikhail Gorbachev was not Leonid Brezhnev's immediate successor.
After Brezhnev's death in 1982, Yuri Andropov became the General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (CPSU). Andropov's tenure was short-lived, as he passed away in 1984. Following Andropov, Konstantin Chernenko assumed the leadership role until his death in 1985. It was only after Chernenko's death that Mikhail Gorbachev became the General Secretary of the CPSU, taking office on March 11, 1985.
Mikhail Gorbachev's rise to power marked a significant turning point in Soviet politics. His policies of reform and openness, known as perestroika and glasnost, aimed to revitalize the Soviet Union's economy and political system. Gorbachev's leadership ultimately led to significant changes within the Soviet Union and the Eastern Bloc, including the loosening of state control, increased political freedoms, and eventually the dissolution of the Soviet Union itself in 1991. While Gorbachev was a key figure in Soviet history, he did not directly succeed Brezhnev but instead followed a line of succession after the deaths of Andropov and Chernenko.
To learn more about General Secretary click here:
brainly.com/question/28041599
#SPJ11
Magine that you are living in colonial Pennsylvania, You may imagine yourself as a white settler. Write a 900 word (three typed, double-spaced pages) letter to someone you know in England describing your situation. You may imagine yourself to be anyone in colonial society
I am optimistic about the prospects for building a prosperous and free society in colonial Pennsylvania, despite the challenges of the harsh climate and conflicts with Native Americans.
I hope this letter finds you in good health and spirits. It has been quite an eventful journey since our arrival in colonial Pennsylvania. As a white settler in this new land, I want to share with you the challenges and opportunities we have encountered in building a life here.
Upon our arrival, we were immediately struck by the harsh climate and unforgiving terrain. The long and bitterly cold winters have been a tremendous test of our endurance. However, we have learned to adapt and make the best of our situation. Through hard work and perseverance, we have managed to establish small homesteads and cultivate the land for sustenance. The fertile soil and abundant natural resources have provided us with a glimmer of hope for a prosperous future.
Despite these initial challenges, the interactions with the Native American tribes have been a source of both tension and learning. While some tribes have welcomed our presence and engaged in mutually beneficial trade, there have been instances of conflict and misunderstanding. It is evident that tensions arise from the clash of cultures and competing claims to land. We must approach these interactions with respect and understanding, striving for peaceful coexistence and fair negotiation. It is my hope that through time and open dialogue, we can establish stronger relationships with the indigenous communities and foster a spirit of collaboration.
One of the most remarkable aspects of colonial Pennsylvania is the diversity of its inhabitants. People from various European nations have come together in pursuit of religious freedom and economic opportunity. This vibrant mixture of cultures has created a unique atmosphere of tolerance and acceptance. We are fortunate to live in a society where different faiths and beliefs are respected, and individuals are given the freedom to practice as they see fit. The Quakers, in particular, have played a significant role in shaping the colony's values of equality and pacifism. Their influence has contributed to a sense of unity and social harmony.
As we look to the future, there is a sense of great potential for this young colony. The natural resources available to us, such as timber, fur, and fertile land, offer numerous economic opportunities. Trade with other colonies and Europe has been steadily growing, providing a lifeline for the prosperity of our settlement. Our growing population and the establishment of towns and cities give us hope for continued growth and development.
While challenges persist, such as the constant threat of conflict with Native American tribes and the ongoing struggle to establish a stable government, I remain optimistic about the future of this land. We have laid the foundation for a society built on principles of freedom, democracy, and religious tolerance. It is my fervent belief that with determination, cooperation, and a steadfast commitment to justice, this colony will flourish and become a beacon of hope for generations to come.
Please convey my warmest regards to all our friends and family back in England. I eagerly await your response and look forward to hearing about the latest developments on your side.
Learn more about prosperous here:
https://brainly.com/question/28746334
#SPJ11
true or false: navigation bars have increased in popularity since 2010. true false
Answer:
TRUE Yes, navigation bars have increased in popularity after 2010
Explanation:
before the civil war, the _____________ aristocracy dominated the society of the south.
Before the Civil War, the plantation aristocracy dominated the society of the South.
In the antebellum era, the Southern states of the United States were primarily agrarian economies reliant on cash crop cultivation, particularly cotton, tobacco, and rice. This agrarian society was largely structured around large plantations, which were owned by a small but powerful elite class known as the plantation aristocracy. These plantation owners amassed significant wealth and controlled vast amounts of land and enslaved labor. They were the economic, political, and social elite of the Southern states, and their dominance permeated every aspect of Southern society.
The plantation aristocracy wielded considerable political power and often held influential positions in state legislatures and Congress. They were able to shape policies and laws to protect their economic interests, such as the preservation of slavery and the expansion of territories suitable for plantation agriculture. Socially, they formed an exclusive and hierarchical class, with elaborate codes of conduct and a strong sense of honor. They lived in opulent mansions, enjoyed luxurious lifestyles, and participated in high-society events.
The plantation aristocracy's control over Southern society was inextricably tied to the institution of slavery. Enslaved people provided the labor necessary for the cultivation of cash crops, enabling the plantation owners to accumulate vast fortunes. This system of forced labor further entrenched the power and wealth of the aristocracy, as it allowed them to maintain their economic dominance and preserve their privileged status.
However, the plantation aristocracy's control over Southern society eventually became a major factor leading to the outbreak of the Civil War. The growing divide between the industrialized Northern states and the agrarian South, coupled with moral opposition to slavery, led to increasing tensions. The power dynamics of the plantation aristocracy clashed with the ideals of equality and freedom promoted by the North, ultimately culminating in the bloody conflict that reshaped the nation.
To learn more about slavery click here brainly.com/question/9030828
#SPJ11
What similarities and differences are noticeable in Ronald Reagan’s wall speech and Mikhail Gorbachevs speech to the communist party of the Soviet Union?
The similarities between Ronald Reagan's speech on the wall and Mikhail Gorbachev's speech to the Communist Party of the Soviet Union are in the scope of change and critique of the system. The differences are related to the objectives and context of the speech.
What was the purpose of Ronald Reagan and Mikhail Gorgachev's speech?Both speeches had the scope to establish social criticisms of government systems, such as the repression of the Berlin Wall and bureaucratization and lack of freedom in the Soviet Union.
Therefore, it can be said that both discourses had similarities in proposing changes and leading the public to reflection, but with different objectives and perspectives.
Find out more about communist party at:
https://brainly.com/question/30964404
#SPJ1
Imagine you work in the US government in the 1930s. What do you think could be done to help ease the burden of the Great Depression on Americans?
During the Great Depression, several measures were taken by the US government to ease the burden on Americans, such as:
Creating jobs through public works programs: The government can invest in public works programs such as building schools, hospitals, parks, and highways.
Implementing social welfare programs: The government can provide assistance to those who are in need, such as providing food, clothing, and shelter for the homeless.
Regulating the banking system: The government can implement regulations to prevent bank failures and protect depositors.
Providing relief for farmers: The government can provide assistance to farmers who were hit hard by the Dust Bowl and low crop prices.
Thus, a combination of government intervention and private enterprise could help ease the burden of the Great Depression on Americans.
For more details regarding US government, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9557002
#SPJ1
explain the terms of the buganda agreement
Answer:
Terms of the Buganda agreement of 1900 were; Kabaka was recognized by the British as the ruler of the Buganda although his powers were limited. Half of the land was made crown land and people allowed to live on it as tenants. A hut tax or three rupees and gun tax were imposed.
realistic plays have been the dominant style of theatre in the twentieth century. true or false?
Answer:true
Explanation:
As Rome has seen a fair share of leaders within its existence they all have contributed many different aspects to Rome. In an argumentative piece you are to write which leader of Rome was the most influential. In at least 3 paragraphs please divulge your argument in a clear manor.
Julius Caesar was a Roman general and politician who named himself dictator of the Roman Empire, a rule that lasted less than one year before he was famously assassinated by political rivals in 44 B.C. He was one of the most influential leader.
Julius Caesar was a Roman general and politician who named himself dictator of the Roman Empire, a rule that lasted less than one year before he was famously assassinated by political rivals in 44 B.C.E.
Caesar was born on July 12 or 13 in 100 B.C.E. to a noble family. During his youth, the Roman Republic was in chaos. Seizing the opportunity, Caesar advanced in the political system and briefly became governor of Spain, a Roman province. Returning to Rome, he formed political alliances that helped him become governor of Gaul, an area that included what is now France and Belgium.
Learn more about Julius Caesar, here:
https://brainly.com/question/30160306
#SPJ1
1. Puritan values influenced Americans in the 1800s. These values included:. A love of blank. . Blank. Sense of blank
1. Puritan values influenced Americans in the 1800s.
These values included:
- A love of God: Puritans placed a strong emphasis on religious devotion and a deep love for God. Their religious beliefs and practices were central to their daily lives and influenced their moral and ethical values.
- Hard work and diligence: Puritans believed in the importance of hard work, discipline, and productivity. They viewed labor as a means of glorifying God and saw success as a sign of divine favor.
- Sense of community: Puritans valued a strong sense of community and communal responsibility. They emphasized the importance of supporting and caring for one another, both spiritually and materially.
- Moral righteousness: Puritans upheld strict moral codes and believed in living virtuous lives. They valued personal integrity, honesty, and a strong sense of personal responsibility.
- Education: Puritans placed a significant emphasis on education, particularly religious education. They believed in the importance of an educated clergy and a well-informed citizenry to maintain a godly society.
These Puritan values had a lasting impact on American society, shaping moral, religious, and cultural norms that persisted well into the 1800s. They influenced various aspects of American life, including work ethic, community involvement, education, and the overall moral fabric of the nation.
Learn more about norms here:
https://brainly.com/question/29742768
#SPJ11
How did the Kansas Nebraska act pull the nation apart
The Kansas-Nebraska Act provided for popular sovereignty, abolished the Missouri Compromise, and established two additional territories.
A violent revolt known as "Bleeding Kansas" was partly a result of the pro- and anti-slavery advocates who flocked to the territories to influence the vote.
The Kansas-Nebraska Act undoubtedly contributed to growing sectionalism in Congress and the US. Between lawmakers who supported slavery in the south and those who opposed it in the north, the legislation ultimately led to significant rifts.
According to popular sovereignty, the Kansas-Nebraska Act permitted each territory to decide on the subject of slavery. The Missouri Compromise, which had prevented the Union from dissolving for the previous 34 years, would be broken if Kansas legalised slavery.
To know more about Kansas Nebraska act, click:
https://brainly.com/question/28281315
#SPJ1
People who went against the social contract
Social contract dissenters challenge the norms and expectations set by society, often questioning authority and advocating for alternative systems or ideologies.
People who go against the social contract are individuals or groups who reject or challenge the established norms, rules, and obligations agreed upon within a society.
They may question the authority of the government, challenge the legitimacy of laws, or actively engage in behaviors that undermine social order.
These dissenters often emerge in times of social unrest, political revolutions, or movements for change.
Their actions can range from peaceful civil disobedience and nonviolent protest to more extreme forms of resistance.
While some view these dissenters as disruptors or troublemakers, others see them as catalysts for progress and social transformation.
Their actions serve as a reminder that the social contract is not fixed or infallible, and that societies must constantly adapt and address the concerns and grievances of its members to maintain social cohesion.
For more such questions on Social contract:
https://brainly.com/question/30336138
#SPJ11
to what extent did the processes discussed in this chapter have roots in the distant past? in what respects did they represent something new?
The processes discussed in this chapter, such as trade, conquest, migration, and cultural exchange, have roots in the distant past. These practices have been integral to human societies for centuries and have shaped the course of history.
The processes examined in the chapter have deep historical roots that can be traced back to early human civilizations. Trade, for instance, has been a fundamental aspect of human interaction since ancient times. Civilizations like the ancient Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans developed extensive trade networks to exchange goods, fostering economic growth and cultural exchange. This early form of trade laid the foundation for the global trading systems that emerged in later centuries.
Similarly, conquest and empire-building have been prevalent throughout history. Powerful empires like the Roman Empire, Mongol Empire, and Ottoman Empire expanded their territories through conquest, establishing dominance over other regions and peoples. The motivation for conquest varied, ranging from the desire for resources and wealth to the pursuit of political power and influence. These conquests shaped political boundaries, cultural landscapes, and the distribution of power for generations to come.
Migration, both voluntary and forced, has also played a significant role in human history. People have migrated in search of better opportunities, to escape conflict or persecution, or due to environmental factors. The movement of people has resulted in the blending of cultures, the spread of ideas, and the establishment of new communities and societies. This ongoing migration has continuously reshaped the demographic, social, and cultural landscapes of various regions.
While these processes have historical precedents, they also represented something new in specific respects. The scale and scope of trade, for instance, expanded dramatically with the development of maritime routes, such as the Silk Road or European exploration of the Americas. The emergence of colonialism and imperialism during the Age of Discovery introduced new dynamics of power and exploitation. Likewise, advancements in transportation and communication technologies in more recent centuries have facilitated greater interconnectivity and accelerated the pace of global interactions.
In summary, the processes discussed in the chapter have deep historical roots, reflecting practices that have shaped human societies for centuries. They represent both continuities from the past and new developments influenced by technological advancements, expanding geographical horizons, and evolving socio-political contexts.
To learn more about human civilizations Click Here: brainly.com/question/15165384
#SPJ11
People had great pride in their countries and thought that obtaining colonies was a way to show strength and power. This statement describes the connection between which two concepts?
The statement describes the connection between national pride and colonialism as a means to demonstrate strength and power.
The connection between national pride and colonialism is evident in the statement. People had a strong sense of pride in their countries and believed that acquiring colonies would showcase their nation's strength and power.
Colonialism involved the expansion of a country's influence and control over other territories and populations, often through military force and economic dominance.
By establishing colonies, countries could demonstrate their ability to project power and assert dominance over foreign lands. The acquisition of colonies was seen as a reflection of a nation's strength and an affirmation of its status in the international arena. It allowed countries to showcase their economic, military, and cultural superiority over other nations.
Moreover, colonialism was often justified by a sense of nationalistic pride, with imperial powers portraying their colonial ventures as a means to civilize and enlighten less-developed regions. This ideological perspective further reinforced the link between national pride and colonial expansion.
In summary, the connection between national pride and colonialism is rooted in the belief that acquiring colonies was a way to demonstrate a country's strength, power, and superiority over other nations, while also promoting its values and civilization.
Learn more about imperial powers here :
https://brainly.com/question/4013820
#SPJ11
in the late 20th century, western technological dominance was challenged by
In the late 20th century, western technological dominance was challenged by the emergence of East Asia.
How did East Asia challenge western dominance ?During the latter part of the 20th century, the East Asia region emerged as a formidable challenger to the long-standing technological dominance of the Western world. The ascent of countries like Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan served as a disruptive force, reshaping the global landscape of innovation and industrial prowess.
The ascendancy of East Asia as a technological powerhouse in the latter part of the 20th century can be attributed to a confluence of factors, including robust government support, substantial investments in research and development, a highly skilled workforce, and a relentless pursuit of innovation and uncompromising quality standards.
Find out more on East Asia at https://brainly.com/question/3907312
#SPJ1
the instructions to lugard in articles (d) and (f) best reflect which of the following regarding the purpose of the board of directors’ letter?
The instructions to Lugard in Articles (d) and (f) best reflect that the purpose of the board of directors' letter is to ensure effective communication with shareholders and provide them with important information.
What was the purpose of the board of directors’ letter?Article (d) instructs Lugard to include a detailed explanation of the company's financial performance, including revenue, expenses, and profitability. This indicates that the board of directors wants the letter to serve as a means of transparency and accountability to shareholders, keeping them informed about the financial health of the company.
Article (f) instructs Lugard to include a summary of the company's strategic goals and plans for the upcoming year. This suggests that the board of directors wants the letter to outline the company's vision, objectives, and future direction. By sharing this information with shareholders, the board aims to align their interests and provide them with insights into the company's strategic decision-making.
Overall, the instructions in Articles (d) and (f) indicate that the board of directors' letter aims to provide shareholders with a comprehensive update on the company's financial performance and strategic plans. It serves as a means of transparency, accountability, and fostering a sense of shared purpose with shareholders.
To learn more about directors' letters, visit
brainly.com/question/28160057
#SPJ11
Compare: Go back to the chromosome view and choose a gene. Create primers anywhere you want in the gene and click Preview primers. A. What do you notice about the copied DNA in each person? B. Click Save primer and select Test primers. Run an analysis with the new primer. What do you notice about the bands on the gel? C. Would this primer help you distinguish people? Explain
When you look at the chromosome view and select a gene, you can create primers anywhere in the gene and preview them.
The DNA copied in each person has the same sequence in terms of the gene you chose, but the variations in the sequence can make it unique. Thus, the copied DNA might be similar, but small changes make it different. Therefore, the copied DNA is the same in every person. So, the primer designed from this copied DNA can be used to distinguish people when comparing the variations in their DNA, which are unique to each individual.
The results on the gel help you distinguish people by observing the band patterns on the gel, which show how the copied DNA reacted with the new primer. The differences and similarities in the patterns show how similar or different the DNA is, making it possible to distinguish between people. Thus, this primer can help distinguish between people in terms of their DNA.The differences in the primer sequences or band patterns on the gel are the factors that distinguish people. The variations are present in every individual’s DNA, which are determined by the number and types of nucleotides present in their DNA. So, these variations can help in identifying individuals using specific primers for a particular gene or sequence.
To learn more about DNA :
https://brainly.com/question/30006059
#SPJ11
what did Winston Churchill want after ww2?
Answer:
free elections and democratic governments in Eastern and Central Europe
Explanation:
hey <3
In response to Senator Joseph McCarthy's anticommunist attacks, President Eisenhowera) publicly denounced him only after he attacked General George Marshall.b) quietly encouraged him to continue his attacks on Democrats.c) publicly opposed his ruthless tactics but privately enjoyed his personal charm.d) allowed him to control personnel policy at the State Department.e) privately supported him but publicly kept his distance.
In response to Senator Joseph McCarthy's anticommunist attacks, President Eisenhower publicly opposed his ruthless tactics but privately supported him.
During the era of McCarthyism in the United States, Senator Joseph McCarthy led a campaign to root out suspected communists from various government institutions. President Dwight D. Eisenhower, while disagreeing with McCarthy's methods, found himself in a delicate position. Eisenhower recognized McCarthy's popularity and appeal to certain segments of the population. As a result, Eisenhower publicly denounced McCarthy's ruthless tactics, expressing his disapproval of the senator's approach. However, behind the scenes, Eisenhower privately supported McCarthy and his anticommunist efforts. This allowed Eisenhower to maintain a delicate balance between disavowing McCarthy's tactics publicly while maintaining a level of support in private.
To learn more about Eisenhower, refer:
brainly.com/question/16818171
#SPJ11
Why was the period following the Julio-Claudian dynasty referred to as the era of the Five Good Emperors? O a. The succession problem exemplified during the Julio Claudian dynasty was resolved by adopting capable leaders instead of passing rule on through inheritance. b. Rome suffered a series of crises such as civil war, natural disaster and debasement of coinage phenomena from which it could never recover. O c Germanic tribes infiltrated Roman territory bringing about the fall of the Roman Empire by placing a barbarian king on the Roman throne. Od. The period was the low point in Roman imperial history and was marked by emperors who operated under greed and self-ambition.
Answer: The correct answer is:
A. The succession problem exemplified during the Julio Claudian dynasty was resolved by adopting capable leaders instead of passing rule on through inheritance.
The period following the Julio-Claudian dynasty, known as the era of the Five Good Emperors (96-180 CE), was marked by a period of relative stability and prosperity in the Roman Empire. This period is called the "Five Good Emperors" because it was marked by five emperors who were chosen for their ability and merit rather than being members of the royal family. These emperors were Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, and Marcus Aurelius.
The Roman Empire had experienced a period of instability during the Julio-Claudian dynasty, which was characterized by a succession of emperors who were often incompetent or tyrannical. The adoption of the Five Good Emperors was a deliberate departure from the previous system of hereditary succession, which had led to instability and conflict.
The Five Good Emperors were respected for their leadership and military prowess, and they were able to maintain peace and prosperity in the empire during their reigns. They implemented important reforms and strengthened the administrative structure of the empire, which helped to ensure its continued success for several centuries after their reigns.
The period following the Julio-Claudian dynasty, known as the era of the Five Good Emperors, was referred to as such because the succession problem that plagued the previous dynasty was resolved by adopting capable leaders instead of passing rule on through inheritance.
The five emperors - Nerva, Trajan, Hadrian, Antoninus Pius, and Marcus Aurelius - were known for their wise and just rule, fostering peace, prosperity, and stability throughout the empire. They were able to maintain the power and prestige of Rome despite facing challenges such as economic difficulties and external threats.
This period marked a high point in Roman imperial history, in contrast to the low point characterized by emperors who operated under greed and self-ambition.
To know more about Julio-Claudian dynasty refer: https://brainly.com/question/31952884
#SPJ11
Ancient Hindu texts describe deities and their battle with evil. One famous story is found in the Ramayana. The stories often teach valuable lessons about obstacles people face in doing the right thing. Which of the followings is NOT one of these obstacles:
The Ramayana is one of the most well-known and popular Hindu texts. The options given are obstacles that people face in doing the right thing, according to ancient Hindu texts such as the Ramayana.
It tells the story of Rama, a prince of Ayodhya who is exiled to the forest for 14 years by his father, King Dasharatha, at the behest of one of his wives. While in exile, Rama's wife Sita is kidnapped by the demon king Ravana, and Rama must battle him to rescue her. This story teaches valuable lessons about the obstacles people face in doing the right thing.
Below are some of these obstacles:1. Lust and temptation2. Doubt and fear3. Greed and envy4. Anger and hatredThe above mentioned are some of the obstacles people face in doing the right thing. Therefore, the option that is not one of these obstacles is "None of the above."This means that all of the options given are obstacles that people face in doing the right thing, according to ancient Hindu texts such as the Ramayana. These texts are still relevant today and continue to provide guidance to people facing obstacles in their daily lives.
To learn more about obstacles:
https://brainly.com/question/30513504
#SPJ11
The military occupations of Asia and Syria was A 1071 B. 1040 C 1044 D.1049
the members of the country rock band creedence clearwater revival were from the bayou areas of louisiana. true or false
False. Creedence Clearwater Revival was formed in California, not Louisiana, but their music was heavily influenced by the rootsy sounds of the American South.
False. While the music of Creedence Clearwater Revival was heavily influenced by the rootsy sounds of the American South, none of the band members were actually from the bayou areas of Louisiana. Creedence Clearwater Revival was formed in El Cerrito, California, in the late 1960s.
The band consisted of John Fogerty (vocals, guitar), Tom Fogerty (rhythm guitar), Stu Cook (bass), and Doug Clifford (drums). Despite their California origins, their music drew inspiration from Southern rock, blues, and country, creating a distinctive sound that resonated with audiences.
Creedence Clearwater Revival achieved great success with hits like "Proud Mary," "Bad Moon Rising," and "Fortunate Son," and became one of the most influential rock bands of their time.
Learn more about Creedence Clearwater Revival click here :brainly.com/question/2142216
#SPJ11
Excerpt taken from The Historic Rise of Old Hickory by Suzanne B. Williams
Four major candidates ran in the 1824 election, all under the "Democratic-Republican" name. One of the candidates, Andrew Jackson, was already famous. In the 1780s, he earned the right to practice law and served in various offices of the state government, including senator. He earned the nickname "Old Hickory" for his toughness as a general during the War of 1812 and First Seminole War. Jackson supported slavery and "Indian removal." This earned him support from voters in southern and frontier states. The other three candidates were John Quincy Adams of Massachusetts, Henry Clay of Kentucky, and William Crawford of Georgia.
U.S. presidents are elected through the Electoral College. The Founding Fathers worried that Americans were too spread out to learn enough about the candidates. Under the Electoral College, Americans cast their ballot for the popular vote, which chooses the electors for each state. The number of electoral votes each state equals the number of representatives and senators combined. The candidates must win an absolute majority of electoral votes to win the election.
In 1824, Andrew Jackson won the popular vote, but he did not win it in each state. Jackson and Adams both won many electoral votes. Jackson won the most with 99. However, a candidate needs an absolute majority of electoral votes to win. In 1824, Jackson needed 131 to win. When there is not majority winner, the election goes to the House of Representatives. This has only happened twice in U.S. history.
Even though he won the popular vote and many electoral votes, Andrew Jackson lost the presidency in 1824. John Quincy Adams was the Secretary of State at this time. Henry Clay was the Speaker of the House of Representatives. Henry Clay, receiving the least, was left out. However, as a leader in the House of Representatives, he had influence over the other members. Clay openly hated Jackson and there were rumors that Clay made a deal with Adams in exchange for his support. The House election declared John Quincy Adams president. Soon, he chose Henry Clay to fill the seat he left vacant, Secretary of State. Jackson was shocked and enraged. Although there was no inquiry of possible wrongdoing, Jackson accused Adams and Clay of making a "corrupt bargain."
John Quincy Adams was a disappointment as president. Many of his goals created divisions like federal funds for internal improvement. Some states thought that taking federal funds would force them to follow certain rules. They felt this reduced their rights as independent states. Jackson took advantage of issues like this one to gather more support. More Jackson supporters found their way to seats in Congress. He was as a man of the people and said Adams could never understand the common man’s concerns.
John Quincy Adams ran against Andrew Jackson in the 1828 election. Personal attacks grew even more vicious, but Andrew Jackson appealed to many. He believed government was for the common man. He believed in strict reading of the law and limited internal improvements. He also believed in states’ rights.
Andrew Jackson easily won the 1828 election, winning both the popular vote and a majority of electoral votes. Historians note the sectional nature of the voting. Support for Jackson was concentrated in South while Adams’ support was mostly in the North. Jackson was so popular because he brought changes to the government. He also wanted to make sure the government was responsible for its actions. Jackson pushed settlement into the frontier. He supported the Indian Removal act. He also defended the spread of slavery. Though his support was heavier in the South, he was determined to keep a unified nation. The rise and presidency of Old Hickory is memorable to Americans today.
Which statement makes a true comparison of the 1824 and 1828 elections?
A) The losers in 1824 were the main candidates for president in 1828.
B) Sectional divisions were appearing in 1824 and very clear in 1828.
C) Candidates were more divided on the issues in 1828 than in 1824.
D) More people voted in the election of 1824 than they did in 1828.
The statement that makes a true comparison of the 1824 and 1828 elections is Sectional divisions appearing in 1824 and very clear in 1828. The correct option is b.
The 1824 election marked the disappearance of the Federalist Party. As the 4th contending candidates were militants of the Democratic-Republican Party. The election was won by John Quincy Adams.
1828 marked the beginning of the current political division under which the political system in the United States operates. As the Andrew Jackson would run again for Presidency as the candidate from the newly formed Democratic Party. He would eventually win the election, becoming the first President from that party.
Learn more about election, here:
https://brainly.com/question/2456582
#SPJ1