Jasmine walks east from her house to a tennis court. She plays for
1.5 hours and then walks home. Her walking speed is 3 miles per
hour. Distances on the map are in miles. For how many hours is
Jasmine away from home? Show your work.
3-15-15
SOLUTION
Jasmine's
house
tennis
court
-1.0
0.5
-2.0 15 -1.0 -0.5 0

No,  a fluid obeying the clausius equation of state have a vapor-liquid transition

This is because a straight line does not exist between a liquid's temperature and its vapour pressure.

The Clausius Clapeyron equation is described as a way of describing a known discontinuous phase transformation that exists between two phases of matter of a single constituent.

This equation was named after Rudolf Clausius and Benoît Paul Émile Clapeyron.

It also states that a straight line does not exist between a liquid's temperature and its vapour pressure.

The equation also helps us to estimate the vapor pressure at another temperature.

Learn more about clausius equation at: https://brainly.com/question/29414397

#SPJ1

The length of parameterized curve given by x(t)=12 t²− 24 t, y(t)=−4 t³  + 12 t² is 4/3

Area of arc = [tex]\int\limits^a_b {\sqrt{\frac{dx}{dt} ^{2} +\frac{dy}{dt}^{2} } } \, dt[/tex]

x(t)=12 t²− 24 t

dx / dt = 24 t - 24

(dx/dt)² = 576 t² + 576 - 1152 t

y(t)=−4 t³  +12 t²

dy/dt = -12 t² +24 t

(dy/dt)² = 144 t⁴ + 576 t² - 576 t³

(dx/dt)² + (dy/dt)² = 144 t⁴ - 576 t³ + 1152 t² - 1152 t + 576

(dx/dt)² + (dy/dt)² = (12(t² -2t +2))²

Area = [tex]\int\limits^1_0 {x^{2} -2x+2} \, dx[/tex]

Area = [ t³/3 - t² + 2t][tex]\left \{ {{1} \atop {0}} \right.[/tex]

Area =[1/3 - 1 + 2 -0]

Area = 4/3

To know more about parameterized curve click here :

https://brainly.com/question/12982907

#SPJ4

To compute the minimum mean square estimate (MMSE) of x given the event a={x<2.5}, we first need to understand what MMSE means. MMSE is a technique used in estimation theory to find the value that minimizes the mean squared error between the estimator and the true value of the parameter being estimated. In simpler terms, it is an approach to finding the best estimate of a value while minimizing the error.

Now, considering the event a={x<2.5}, we need to determine the probability distribution of x. Unfortunately, without any information about the probability distribution of x, it is impossible to compute the MMSE. The MMSE calculation relies on the probability distribution of x to determine the estimate that minimizes the mean squared error.  If you can provide more information about the probability distribution of x, I would be glad to help you compute the MMSE. In general, once you have the probability distribution, you can calculate the expected value of x given the event a={x<2.5}, which will be the minimum mean square estimate.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The best point estimate for the mean amount of d-glucose in cockroach hindguts under these conditions is approximately 44.24 micrograms.

To find the best point estimate for the mean, we calculate the average (or the arithmetic mean) of the given data points. Adding up the amounts of d-glucose in the hindguts of the 5 cockroaches and dividing by the total number of cockroaches (which is 5 in this case), we get:

(55.95 + 68.24 + 52.73 + 21.50 + 23.78) / 5 ≈ 44.24

Therefore, the best point estimate for the mean amount of d-glucose in cockroach hindguts, based on the given sample, is approximately 44.24 micrograms.

The best point estimate for the mean is obtained by calculating the average of the observed values in the sample. This provides a single value that represents the central tendency of the data. In this case, we add up the amounts of d-glucose in the hindguts of the 5 cockroaches and divide by the total number of cockroaches to find the mean. Rounding the result to the nearest hundredth, we obtain 44.24 micrograms as the best point estimate for the mean amount of d-glucose in cockroach hindguts under the given conditions.

Learn more about mean here:

https://brainly.com/question/31252149

#SPJ11

The equation that gives total savings y as a function of the number of months x is y = $300x

Given that Mrs. White started saving $300 a month. After 3 months, she had $1200. Now, we need to write an equation that gives total savings y as a function of the number of months x
Let us consider that the total savings Mrs. White saved after x months = y
From the given data, we can see that the amount of saving she does each month = $300
So, at the end of 3 months, she had saved an amount of= $300 × 3 = $900
Total savings after 3 months, y = $1200
Thus, we can say that; the total amount she saves, increases every month by $300$300$300 ×x= $y (total savings)
We can write this equation as the function of total savings y as a function of the number of months
x:y = $300x

Thus, the equation that gives total savings y as a function of the number of months x is y = $300x.

To know more about total savings, click here

https://brainly.com/question/7965246

#SPJ11

The sum of the infinite geometric series is 64/7 or approximately 9.143.

To find the sum of an infinite geometric series, we need to determine if the series is convergent or divergent. A geometric series is convergent if the common ratio, denoted by "r", lies between -1 and 1.

In the given series, the common ratio can be calculated by dividing any term by its preceding term. Let's calculate the common ratio:

r = [tex](-12) / 16 = -3/4[/tex]

Since the absolute value of the common ratio, |r| = 3/4, is less than 1, the series is convergent.

The sum of an infinite geometric series can be calculated using the formula: S = a / (1 - r), where "a" is the first term of the series.

Using the given series, a = 16 and r = -3/4, we can calculate the sum:

S = [tex]16 / (1 - (-3/4)) = 16 / (1 + 3/4) = 16 / (7/4) = 16 * (4/7) = 64/7[/tex]

Therefore, the sum of the infinite geometric series is 64/7 or approximately 9.143.

For more questions on series

https://brainly.com/question/30087275

#SPJ8

Joe had the correct answer, and Robert and Myra made mistakes in their addition of the fractions.

a) To determine who had the correct answer, we compare the given answers of Robert, Myra, and Joe.

Robert's answer: 5 1/3

Myra's answer: 2 1/12

Joe's answer: 4 5/6

To compare these mixed numbers, it's helpful to convert them to improper fractions:

Robert's answer: 5 1/3 = (5 * 3 + 1) / 3 = 16/3

Myra's answer: 2 1/12 = (2 * 12 + 1) / 12 = 25/12

Joe's answer: 4 5/6 = (4 * 6 + 5) / 6 = 29/6

Comparing the improper fractions, we can see that Joe's answer of 29/6 is the largest.

Therefore, Joe had the correct answer.

b) Let's analyze how Robert and Myra obtained their answers and where they went wrong:

Robert's answer of 5 1/3 = 16/3:

It seems that Robert incorrectly added the whole number and the fraction separately without considering the common denominator. . The correct sum would be (5 * 3 + 1) / 3 = 16/3, which is Joe's answer.

Myra's answer of 2 1/12 = 25/12:

Myra's mistake appears to be similar to Robert's mistake. She may have added 2 and 1 to get 3 and then added 1/12 to get 1 1/12.

However, the correct addition should be done by finding a common denominator, which in this case is 12, and adding the fractions. The correct sum would be (2 * 12 + 1) / 12 = 25/12, which is not the correct answer.

In conclusion, Joe had the correct answer, and Robert and Myra made mistakes in their addition of the fractions.

Learn more about fraction at https://brainly.com/question/17220365

#SPJ1

The area of the composite shape is 51 sq. in.

First, let's calculate the area of the rectangle:

Area of a rectangle = length × width

Given that the length of the rectangle is 6 inches and the width is 7 inches, the area of the rectangle is:

Area of rectangle = 6 × 7 = 42 sq. in.

Next, let's calculate the area of the triangle:

Area of a triangle = 1/2(base × height)

The base of the triangle is 3 inches, and we need to determine the height. Unfortunately, the height is not given, so we cannot calculate the area of the triangle accurately. Let's consider it as an incomplete shape for now.

Now, let's find the total area of the composite shape by adding the area of the rectangle and the area of the triangle:

Area of composite shape = area of rectangle + area of triangle

Substituting the known values:

Area of composite shape = 42 sq. in. + 1/2(3 × 6)

Simplifying the expression:

Area of composite shape = 42 sq. in. + 1/2(18)

Area of composite shape = 42 sq. in. + 9 sq. in.

Area of composite shape = 51 sq. in.

Therefore, the area of the composite shape is 51 sq. in.

To know more about area here

https://brainly.com/question/14994710

#SPJ4

The sum of the expressions is 2(3x + 4)

To determine the sum of the expressions, we need to know that algebraic expressions are described as those expressions that are made up of terms, variables, constants, coefficients and factors.

Algebraic expressions are also those expressions that are known to consist of different arithmetic operations.

These arithmetic operations are enumerated thus;

From the information given, we have that;

3x + 4 + 4 + 3x

collect the like terms, we have;

3x + 3x + 4 + 4

Add the like terms, we get;

6x + 8

Factorize

2(3x + 4)

Learn about algebraic expressions at: https://brainly.com/question/4344214

#SPJ1

Complete question:

What is the sum when 3x+4 is added to 4+3x?

a) the mean of pygmy sloths is 12 pounds, b) the pygmy sloths is 0.75 pounds. c) means-to-MAD ratio is 21.33

(a) To calculate the mean for each type of sloth, we sum up the weights and divide by the number of observations.

For the pygmy sloths:

Mean = (14 + 15 + 16 + 16 + 16 + 16 + 17 + 18) / 8

= 128 / 8

= 16 pounds

For the maned sloths:

Mean = (10 + 11 + 11 + 12 + 12 + 12 + 14 + 14) / 8

= 96 / 8

= 12 pounds

(b) For the pygmy sloths:

MAD = (|14 - 16| + |15 - 16| + |16 - 16| + |16 - 16| + |16 - 16| + |16 - 16| + |17 - 16| + |18 - 16|) / 8

= (2 + 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 1 + 2) / 8

= 6 / 8

= 0.75 pounds

For the maned sloths:

MAD = (|10 - 12| + |11 - 12| + |11 - 12| + |12 - 12| + |12 - 12| + |12 - 12| + |14 - 12| + |14 - 12|) / 8

= (2 + 1 + 1 + 0 + 0 + 0 + 2 + 2) / 8

= 8 / 8

= 1 pound

(c) The means-to-MAD ratio for the pygmy sloths is:

Means-to-MAD ratio = Mean / MAD

= 16 / 0.75

= 21.33

The means-to-MAD ratio for the maned sloths is:

Means-to-MAD ratio = Mean / MAD

= 12 / 1

= 12

(d) Based on the information provided, we can infer that the weights of the pygmy sloths are more variable compared to the maned sloths.

Learn more about Mean Absolute Deviation at https://brainly.com/question/31220757

#SPJ1

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

first , calculate the measure of ∠ A

the sum of the 3 angles in a triangle = 180° , that is

∠ A + 80° + 60° = 180°

∠ A + 140° = 180° ( subtract 140° from both sides )

∠ A = 40°

the shortest side in the triangle is the side opposite the smallest angle in the triangle.

the smallest angle is ∠ A = 40° , then

the shortest side is the side opposite ∠ A , that is BC

The answer is (-5, -1), option B is correct.

Given that vector u has initial point at (3,9) and terminal point at (-7,5) and vector v has initial point at (1, -4) and terminal point at (6, -1). We need to find u + v in component form.The component form of the vector is obtained by subtracting the initial point from the terminal point. The result is the vector in component form. The components of vector u are:u = (-7 - 3, 5 - 9) = (-10, -4)The components of vector v are:v = (6 - 1, -1 - (-4)) = (5, 3)Now, we can add the vectors in component form. u + v = (-10, -4) + (5, 3) = (-10 + 5, -4 + 3) = (-5, -1)Hence, the answer is (-5, -1).Therefore, option B is correct.

Learn more about Component here,Which of the following pairs of components constitutes the human side of information systems? A) software and procedures...

https://brainly.com/question/30186389

#SPJ11

Based on the measured Auv value of 2.3, the new estimate for the Eddington ratio of the AGN would be lower than previously thought. The Eddington ratio represents the balance between the accretion rate onto the supermassive black hole at the center of the AGN and the radiation pressure that is generated. A higher Eddington ratio indicates that the black hole is accreting material at a rate that is approaching or exceeding the maximum limit set by radiation pressure. The presence of dust in the galaxy's center has attenuated the light from the AGN, which has impacted our interpretation of its behavior by obscuring the true level of accretion onto the black hole.

To provide a new estimate of the Eddington ratio for this AGN, considering the value of Auv 2.3 toward the nucleus of the galaxy, you should follow these steps:

1. Determine the intrinsic luminosity of the AGN by correcting the observed luminosity for dust extinction. Use the given Auv value (2.3) to find the extinction factor and calculate the intrinsic luminosity (L_intrinsic = L_observed * extinction factor).
2. Calculate the Eddington luminosity (L_Eddington) for the AGN, which is the maximum luminosity it can achieve while still being stable. You will need to know the mass of the black hole at the center of the galaxy for this calculation.
3. Divide the intrinsic luminosity by the Eddington luminosity to get the Eddington ratio: Eddington ratio = L_intrinsic / L_Eddington.

The Eddington ratio provides insight into the accretion rate and radiative efficiency of the AGN. A higher Eddington ratio indicates that the AGN is accreting material at a faster rate, leading to more intense radiation. The presence of dust has impacted your interpretation of the AGN's behavior by attenuating the light from the AGN, causing you to underestimate its true luminosity and, consequently, the Eddington ratio. Correcting for this dust extinction provides a more accurate estimate of the AGN's accretion rate and radiative efficiency.

Learn more about Eddington :

https://brainly.com/question/30885420

#SPJ11

The smallest value of n that works is 11.

We can expand the given equation using the binomial theorem:

(x^2 + 1.2)^n = ∑(k=0 to n) [n choose k] x^(2(n-k)) (1.2)^k

The coefficient of x^6 in the expansion will be given by the term where k = n - 3, i.e.,

[n choose n-3] x^(2(3)) (1.2)^(n-3) = (n(n-1)(n-2)/(3!)) x^6 (1.2)^(n-3)

We want this coefficient to be larger than 200000, so we have:

(n(n-1)(n-2)/(3!)) (1.2)^(n-3) > 200000/16

Simplifying and taking the logarithm of both sides:

(n-1)log(1.2) + log(n(n-1)(n-2)) - log(3!) > log(12500)

Using the fact that log(n) < n for all n > 0, we can approximate log(n(n-1)(n-2)) by n log(n) and simplify further:

(n-1)log(1.2) + 3log(n) - log(3) > log(12500)

Now, we can use trial and error to find the smallest value of n that satisfies this inequality. We can start with n = 10 and increase it until we get a value that works:

For n = 10: (9)log(1.2) + 3log(10) - log(3) ≈ 2.413, which is not greater than log(12500) ≈ 4.819.

For n = 11: (10)log(1.2) + 3log(11) - log(3) ≈ 4.299, which is greater than log(12500).

Therefore, the smallest value of n that works is 11.

Learn more about smallest value  here:

https://brainly.com/question/9089501

#SPJ11

The Airy differential equation is a second-order linear ordinary differential equation given by Fourier Transform:

-d^2u/dx^2 = x*u

To find a bounded solution to this equation, we can use the Fourier transform. The Fourier transform of a function f(x) is given by:

F(ω) = ∫ f(x) e^(-iωx) dx

Using the Fourier transform, we can convert the differential equation into an algebraic equation in terms of the Fourier transform F(ω):

-ω^2 F(ω) = ∫ x*u(x) e^(-iωx) dx

We can rewrite the integral on the right-hand side using integration by parts:

∫ x*u(x) e^(-iωx) dx = -∫ u(x) d/dx(e^(-iωx) dx)

= -iω∫ u(x) e^(-iωx) dx + [u(x) e^(-iωx)]^∞_0

Since we are looking for a bounded solution, the term [u(x) e^(-iωx)]^∞_0 must be equal to zero. Therefore, we have:

ω^2 F(ω) = iω∫ u(x) e^(-iωx) dx

We can then solve for the Fourier transform F(ω):

F(ω) = i/ω ∫ u(x) e^(-iωx) dx

Finally, we can take the inverse Fourier transform to find the solution u(x):

u(x) = (1/2π) ∫ F(ω) e^(iωx) dω

Substituting the expression for F(ω), we have:

u(x) = i/(2πω) ∫ ∫ u(y) e^(-iω(y-x)) dy dω

This gives us an integral formula for a bounded solution to the Airy differential equation in terms of the Fourier transform.

More related to Fourier Transform: https://brainly.com/question/28984681

#SPJ11

Given that $Y\sim\text{Exp}(A)$, the probability density function of $Y$ is $f_Y(y)=Ae^{-Ay}$ for $y\geq 0$.

Let $X\sim\text{Poisson}(Y)$. Then, the conditional probability

mass function of $X$ given $Y=y$ is

P(X=k∣Y=y)=e−yykk!,k=0,1,2,…

To find the mean and variance of $X$, we first find $E[XY]$ and $E[X^2Y]$.

\begin{align*}

E[XY] &= \int_{0}^{\infty} E[XY|Y=y]f_Y(y)dy \

&= \int_{0}^{\infty} E[Xy]Ae^{-Ay}dy \

&= \int_{0}^{\infty} ye^{-y}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}k\frac{y^k}{k!}Ae^{-Ay}dy \

&= \int_{0}^{\infty} ye^{-y}\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{y^{k-1}}{(k-1)!}Ae^{-Ay}dy \

&= A\int_{0}^{\infty} y\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{(Ay)^{k-1}}{(k-1)!}e^{-Ay}e^{-y}dy \ &= A\int_{0}^{\infty} y\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{(Ay)^{k}}{k!}e^{-Ay}e^{-y}dy \

&= A\int_{0}^{\infty} ye^{-(A+1)y}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{(Ay)^{k}}{k!}dy \

&= A\int_{0}^{\infty} ye^{-(A+1)y}e^{Ay}dy \

&= \frac{A}{(A+1)^2} \end{align*}

Similarly, we can find $E[X^2Y]$ as:

\begin{align*}

E[X^2Y] &= \int_{0}^{\infty} E[X^2Y|Y=y]f_Y(y)dy \

&= \int_{0}^{\infty} E[X^2y]Ae^{-Ay}dy \

&= \int_{0}^{\infty} y^2e^{-y}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}k^2\frac{y^k}{k!}Ae^{-Ay}dy \

&= \int_{0}^{\infty} y^2e^{-y}\sum_{k=2}^{\infty}\frac{k(k-1)y^{k-2}}{(k-2)!}Ae^{-Ay}dy \

&= A\int_{0}^{\infty} y^2\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{(Ay)^{k}}{k!}e^{-Ay}e^{-y}dy \ &= A\int_{0}^{\infty} y^2e^{-(A+1)y}\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}\frac{(Ay)^{k}}{k!}dy \

&= A\int_{0}^{\

For such more questions on Probability density function:

https://brainly.com/question/28705601

#SPJ11

The surface area of the portion of the plane 3x + 2y + z = 6 that lies in the first octant is 2√14.

The surface area of the portion of the plane 3x + 2y + z = 6 that lies in the first octant can be found by computing the surface integral of the constant function f(x,y,z) = 1 over the portion of the plane in the first octant.

We can parameterize the portion of the plane in the first octant using two variables, say u and v, as follows:

x = u

y = v

z = 6 - 3u - 2v

The partial derivatives with respect to u and v are:

∂x/∂u = 1, ∂x/∂v = 0

∂y/∂u = 0, ∂y/∂v = 1

∂z/∂u = -3, ∂z/∂v = -2

The normal vector to the plane is given by the cross product of the partial derivatives with respect to u and v:

n = ∂x/∂u × ∂x/∂v = (-3, -2, 1)

The surface area of the portion of the plane in the first octant is then given by the surface integral:

∫∫ ||n|| dA = ∫∫ ||∂x/∂u × ∂x/∂v|| du dv

Since the function f(x,y,z) = 1 is constant, we can pull it out of the integral and just compute the surface area of the portion of the plane in the first octant:

∫∫ ||n|| dA = ∫∫ ||∂x/∂u × ∂x/∂v|| du dv = ∫0^2 ∫0^(2-3/2u) ||(-3,-2,1)|| dv du

Evaluating the integral, we get:

∫∫ ||n|| dA = ∫0^2 ∫0^(2-3/2u) √14 dv du = ∫0^2 (2-3/2u) √14 du = 2√14

Therefore, the surface area of the portion of the plane 3x + 2y + z = 6 that lies in the first octant is 2√14.

Learn more about surface area here

https://brainly.com/question/28776132

#SPJ11

The limit of the ratio is equal to infinity, i.e.,

lim[tex]x^{3/9}e^{x/5[/tex] = ∞

x->∞

is ∞.

To evaluate the limit, we can use L'Hopital's Rule, which states that if the limit of the ratio of two functions is of the indeterminate form 0/0 or ∞/∞, then the limit of the ratio is equal to the limit of the ratio of their derivatives (if the latter limit exists).

Applying L'Hopital's Rule to the given limit, we get:

lim [tex]x^{3/9}e^{x/5[/tex] = lim[tex](3x^{2/9})e^{x/5[/tex]

x->∞ x->∞

Again applying L'Hôpital's Rule, we get:

lim[tex](3x^{2/9})e^{x/5[/tex] = lim[tex](6x/9)e^{x/5[/tex]

x->∞ x->∞

One more time applying L'Hopital's Rule, we get:

lim (6x/9)[tex]e^{x/5[/tex]= lim[tex]6e^{x/5} / 9[/tex]

x->∞ x->∞

Since the limit of the ratio of the derivatives exists, we can evaluate it directly to get:

lim[tex]x^{3/9}e^{x/5[/tex] = lim ([tex]6e^{x/5[/tex]) / 9

x->∞ x->∞

x approaches infinity, [tex]e^{x/5[/tex] grows much faster than any polynomial function of x.

For similar questions on ratio

https://brainly.com/question/30396381

#SPJ11

The limit to be evaluated is: lim x3/9ex/5, x->[infinity]

By direct substitution, we have:

lim x3/9ex/5

x->[infinity] = infinity/ infinity

This form is indeterminate and L'Hôpital's Rule can be applied to evaluate the limit.

Applying L'Hôpital's Rule, we take the derivative of both the numerator and denominator with respect to x:

lim x3/9ex/5

x->[infinity] = lim (3x2/9) (ex/5) / (5x4/225) (ex/5)

x->[infinity]

Simplifying this expression, we get:

lim x3/9ex/5

x->[infinity] = lim (3/9) (225/x2) (ex/5)

x->[infinity]

As x approaches infinity, the exponential function grows much faster than the polynomial function x3/9, so the limit of ex/5 as x approaches infinity is infinity. Therefore, the overall limit is infinity, and we can write:

lim x3/9ex/5

x->[infinity] = infinity

To learn more about L'Hôpital's Rule click here

brainly.com/question/29252522

#SPJ11

We can model the time between telephone orders using an exponential distribution with a rate parameter of λ = 5.1 orders per hour.

The probability of at least 35 minutes (0.5833 hours) elapsing before the next order is the same as the probability that the time until the next order is greater than 0.5833 hours.

Let X be the time until the next order, then X is exponentially distributed with parameter λ = 5.1. The probability we want to find is:

P(X > 0.5833) = e^(-λ * 0.5833)

Substituting λ = 5.1, we get:

P(X > 0.5833) = e^(-5.1 * 0.5833) = 0.3239

Therefore, the probability that at least 35 minutes will elapse before the next telephone order is 0.3239, rounded to 4 decimal places.

Learn more about parameter here

https://brainly.com/question/29344078

#SPJ11

It does appears that elite soccer players are more likely to develop arthritis of the hip or knee than comparable recreational soccer players.

To determine whether elite soccer players are more likely to develop arthritis of the hip or knee than recreational soccer players, we can conduct a hypothesis test using a two-proportion z-test.

Let p1 be the proportion of former elite soccer players who developed arthritis of the hip or knee and p2 be the proportion of recreational soccer players who developed arthritis of the hip or knee. The null hypothesis is that the two proportions are equal (p1 = p2) and the alternative hypothesis is that the proportion for the elite soccer players is higher than that for the recreational soccer players (p1 > p2).

The test statistic for the two-proportion z-test is:

z = (p1 - p2) / sqrt((p_hat * (1 - p_hat) / n1) + (p_hat * (1 - p_hat) / n2))

where p_hat is the pooled proportion, n1 and n2 are the sample sizes, and the standard error of the difference in proportions is:

SE = sqrt((p_hat * (1 - p_hat) / n1) + (p_hat * (1 - p_hat) / n2))

Using the given information, we have:

n1 = n2 = 500

x1 = 0.38 * 500 = 190

x2 = 0.32 * 500 = 160

p_hat = (x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2) = 0.35

Therefore, the test statistic is:

z = (0.38 - 0.32) / sqrt((0.35 * (1 - 0.35) / 500) + (0.35 * (1 - 0.35) / 500)) = 1.737

Using a standard normal distribution table, we find the critical value for a one-tailed test with a = 0.05 to be 1.645. Since the test statistic (1.737) is greater than the critical value (1.645), we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence to suggest that the proportion of former elite soccer players who develop arthritis of the hip or knee is higher than that for recreational soccer players.

Therefore, it appears that elite soccer players are more likely to develop arthritis of the hip or knee than comparable recreational soccer players.

Learn more about z-test:

https://brainly.com/question/30034815

#SPJ11

The water usage of New York State per person per day can be calculated using the given information.

The population of New York State is given to be 1.9 × 10⁷, while more than 8.9 × 10⁹ gallons of water are withdrawn each day from the water sources.

The daily water usage per person in New York State is as follows:

Number of gallons of water withdrawn each day from all sources of water = More than 8.9 × 10⁹

Number of persons living in New York State = 1.9 × 10⁷

Now, we can calculate the daily water usage per person in New York State as follows:

Daily water usage per person =

Number of gallons of water withdrawn each day / Number of persons living in New York State

= (8.9 × 10⁹) / (1.9 × 10⁷)

≈ 468 gallons (rounded to the nearest whole number)

Therefore, the daily water usage per person in New York State is approximately 468 gallons.

To know more about gallons visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/26007201

#SPJ14

Using the properties of integrals, we can write:

∫(5ex - 5) dx = ∫5ex dx - ∫5 dx

Using the result given to us, we know that:

∫ex dx = ex + C

Therefore:

∫5ex dx = 5∫ex dx = 5(ex + C) = 5ex + 5C

And:

∫5 dx = 5x + C

Putting it all together, we get:

∫(5ex - 5) dx = 5ex + 5C - (5x + C) = 5ex - 5x + 4C

To determine the value of C, we use the given result:

∫3ex dx from 1 to 3 = e3 - e

We evaluate this integral using the same method as above:

∫3ex dx = 3ex + C

∫ex dx = ex + C

∫3ex dx = 3(ex + C) = 3ex + 3C

Substituting in the limits of integration, we get:

e3 + C - (e + C) = e3 - e

Solving for C, we get:

C = 1

Therefore:

∫(5ex - 5) dx = 5ex - 5x + 4C = 5ex - 5x + 4

Learn more about integrals here:

https://brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

Option B. The function that represents the profit, P(m), where m is the number of minutes the platform uses on advertisements is: P(m) = -1.6(x - 150)² + 10000.

The capability that addresses the benefit, P(m), where m is the quantity of minutes the stage utilizes on promotions is:

P(m) = - 1.6(x - 150)² + 10000

This is on the grounds that we know that the greatest benefit of $10,000 happens when the stage utilizes 150 minutes daily on notices, and the benefit capability ought to have a most extreme as of now. The capability is in the vertex structure, which is P(m) = a(x - h)² + k, where (h,k) is the vertex of the parabola and a decides if the parabola opens upwards or downwards.

The negative worth of an in the capability shows that the parabola opens downwards and has a most extreme worth at the vertex (h,k). The vertex is at (150,10000), and that implies that the most extreme benefit of $10,000 happens when the stage utilizes 150 minutes daily on ads.

In this way, the capability that addresses the benefit, P(m), where m is the quantity of minutes the stage utilizes on ads is P(m) = - 1.6(x - 150)² + 10000. The other given capabilities don't match the given circumstances for the most extreme benefit, and in this way, they are not fitting to address the benefit capability of JP Creations.

To learn more about Profit, refer:

https://brainly.com/question/15288169

#SPJ1

We have W = (X1 + ... + X500) - (Y1 + ... + Y500), where X1, Y1, X2, Y2, ... are independent and uniformly distributed in the unit interval [0, 1].

The mean of each X and Y variable is 1/2, and the variance of each variable is 1/12. By linearity of expectation, we have E[W] = E[X1 + ... + X500] - E[Y1 + ... + Y500] = 0, and by independence, Var(W) = Var(X1 + ... + X500) + Var(Y1 + ... + Y500) = 500/12 + 500/12 = 250/6.

By the Central Limit Theorem, we know that the distribution of W is approximately normal with mean 0 and variance 250/6. Therefore, we can standardize W as follows:

Z = (W - E[W]) / sqrt(Var(W)) = W / (sqrt(250/6)).

Then, we can approximate P(W - E[W] < 0.01) as:

P(W < 0.01) = P(Z < 0.01 / sqrt(250/6)).

Using a standard normal table or calculator, we find that P(Z < 0.01 / sqrt(250/6)) is approximately 0.122. Therefore, a good approximation to the probability P(W - E[W] < 0.01) is 0.122.

Learn more about variable here:

https://brainly.com/question/29583350

#SPJ11

The explanatory variable is the temperature received by similar crops, and the response variable is the crop yield.

In this scenario, the farmer wants to explore whether there is a relationship between temperature and crop yield. The explanatory variable, also known as the independent variable, is the temperature received by the crops. This variable is chosen by the farmer to explain or predict changes in the response variable, which is the crop yield.

Crop yield is the dependent variable or the response variable, which is influenced by the independent variable or the explanatory variable. In other words, the response variable depends on the changes in the explanatory variable. In this case, crop yield depends on the temperature received by the crops.

To test whether there is a relationship between temperature and crop yield, the farmer can collect data on the temperature received by similar crops in different locations and compare this with the corresponding crop yield. The data collected can be analyzed using statistical techniques, such as regression analysis, to determine if there is a significant correlation between the two variables.

for such more question on  explanatory variable

https://brainly.com/question/17439095

#SPJ11

The explanatory variable in this scenario is the temperature received by similar crops, while the response variable is the harvest of the crop.

In this case, the farmer is trying to determine if the temperature received by similar crops can be used to predict the harvest of the crop.

The explanatory variable is the variable that is being used to make predictions or explain differences in the response variable. In this situation, the explanatory variable is the "temperature received by similar crops."

The response variable is the variable that we are trying to predict or explain based on the explanatory variable. In this case, the response variable is the "harvest of the crop."

So, the explanatory variable is "temperature received by similar crops," and the response variable is "harvest of the crop."

To learn more about temperature : brainly.com/question/11464844

#SPJ11

a. to make f(x) continuous at x = 11, we need to define f(11) = 1/22. b. there is a solution for the equation f(x) = 0 on the interval [1, 2].

a) f(11)=5

To make the function f(x) continuous at x = 11, we need to remove the infinite discontinuity at x = 11. We can do this by factoring out (x-11) from the numerator and simplifying the expression. After factoring out (x-11), we get (sqrt(x) + 5 + 4)/(x - 11) = (sqrt(x) + 9)/(x - 11). We can see that this expression is undefined at x = 11, so we need to determine the limit of the expression as x approaches 11. We can use L'Hopital's rule to find that the limit is 1/22. Therefore, to make f(x) continuous at x = 11, we need to define f(11) = 1/22.

b) No. because f(1)<0 and f(2)<0.

The intermediate value theorem states that if f(x) is continuous on the closed interval [a, b] and if k is any number between f(a) and f(b), then there exists at least one number c in the open interval (a, b) such that f(c) = k. In this case, f(x) = 2x^3 - sqrt(6x + 2) is continuous on the closed interval [1, 2]. We can see that f(1) is negative and f(2) is also negative. Therefore, by the intermediate value theorem, we cannot conclude that there is a solution for the equation f(x) = 0 on the interval [1, 2].

Learn more about interval here

https://brainly.com/question/479532

#SPJ11

The correct Answer in  decimal form of twenty-one and four hundred six thousandths is 21.406.

A decimal is a fraction written in a special form. Instead of writing 1/2,

for example, you can express the fraction as the decimal 0.5,

where the zero is in the ones place and the five is in the tenths place.

Decimal comes from the Latin word decimus, meaning tenth, from the root word decem, or 10.

To convert twenty-one and four hundred six thousandths to decimal form, we can combine the whole number and the decimal part as follows:

21.406

To know more about decimal form,visit:

https://brainly.com/question/5194080

#SPJ11

The common factor for 13%, 0.125, 1/5, and 10% is that they can be expressed as fractions with denominators of 100.

All of the numbers can be converted to fractions with a denominator of 100.

To convert 13% to a fraction with a denominator of 100, we need to divide 13 by 100, which gives us 0.13.

To convert 0.125 to a fraction with a denominator of 100, we multiply both the numerator and denominator by 100 to get 12.5/100.

To convert 1/5 to a fraction with a denominator of 100, we multiply the numerator and denominator by 20, which gives us 20/100.

To convert 10% to a fraction with a denominator of 100, we divide 10 by 100, which gives us 0.1.

To know more about denominators visit:

https://brainly.com/question/32621096

#SPJ11

Thus, the probability of rolling a six is 1/6 or 16.67%, and the probability of rolling an even number is 1/2 or 50%.

a) When a fair die is rolled, there are 6 possible outcomes (1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6), and each outcome has an equal probability of occurring.

To find the probability of rolling a six, we can determine the ratio of the desired outcome (rolling a 6) to the total possible outcomes:

Probability of rolling a six = (Number of ways to roll a six) / (Total possible outcomes)

Probability of rolling a six  = 1/6 ≈ 0.1667

Probability of rolling a six  16.67%.

b) To find the probability of rolling an even number, we need to identify the even outcomes (2, 4, and 6) and calculate the ratio of the desired outcomes to the total possible outcomes:

Probability of rolling an even number = (Number of ways to roll an even number) / (Total possible outcomes)

Probability of rolling an even number = 3/6 = 1/2 or

Probability of rolling an even number = 0.5 or 50%.

In summary, the probability of rolling a six is 1/6 or 16.67%, while the probability of rolling an even number is 1/2 or 50%.

know more about the possible outcomes

https://brainly.com/question/30450992

#SPJ11