The true statement about primary sources of law in the U.S. is Option a) A contract between two parties is an example of private law.
Primary sources of law are those that establish the law itself and include constitutional law, statutory law, administrative law, and common law. Private law refers to the legal relationship between individuals and entities, and contracts between two parties are a common example of private law.
Substantive law refers to laws that create rights and obligations, while procedural laws determine how those substantive laws are enforced. Therefore, statement b) is incorrect. Procedural laws, on the other hand, govern the process by which legal disputes are resolved and the rights of individuals within the legal system. This makes statement c) incorrect as well.
Public law is concerned with the relationship between the government and its citizens, including constitutional law, administrative law, and criminal law. It is not limited to governing the citizenry and does extend to lawmakers themselves, making statement d) incorrect.
Overall, understanding the different types of primary sources of law is essential to comprehending the legal system in the U.S. and how it functions. It is important to note that the law is constantly evolving, and staying informed of changes and updates is crucial for staying within legal boundaries. Therefore, Option A is Correct.
Know more about the Contract here :
https://brainly.com/question/30626918
#SPJ11
What are 2 pros of a certificate of deposit?
This is a financial commodity that most often pays a fixed interest rate for a set period of time, that is from small number of years going up. It is helpful in many ways like:
Acquisition of higher returns. The normal rates in this deposits are way higher than the ones you would receive in a common savings account. This is because the interest remains the same through the years and the other types of accounts increase annually.
The Returns never change. Unlike the other saving accounts, the certificate of deposit which is a locked deposit account and therefore cannot be altered with at any instance.
Consider reading more about certificate of deposit here:
https://brainly.com/question/29789687
#SPJ4
Why do you suppose Madison wanted to have the Constitution ratified by delegates to state conventions elected directly by the people?
James Madison wanted to have the Constitution ratified by delegates to state conventions elected directly by the people because he believed that this approach would ensure that the Constitution would have the broadest possible support among the American people. By having the Constitution ratified by state conventions, Madison and the other framers of the Constitution were able to ensure that the Constitution would be ratified by individuals who were elected specifically to consider the Constitution and to make a decision about whether to ratify it. This approach also ensured that the Constitution would be ratified by individuals who were representative of the people, rather than by state legislatures, which might be more responsive to special interests or political considerations. Additionally, the framers of the Constitution believed that this approach would be more democratic and would help to build a sense of buy-in and ownership among the American people for the new government.
Chapter one detaile many factors that can influence juvenile offending. Please select two of those factors and explain how they can affect offending and propose one solution that may help alleviate each of your selected factors.
Research have shown that factors that influence juvenile offending or delinquency includes family characteristics such as:
poor parenting skillsfamily sizehome discordchild maltreatmentantisocial parents etc.What does Juvenile delinquency mean in law?Juvenile delinquency refers to criminal behavior committed by individuals under the age of 18. The causes of juvenile delinquency are complex and varied, but can include factors such as poverty, abuse or neglect, peer pressure, and lack of parental supervision or involvement.
Preventing juvenile delinquency can be approached through a variety of strategies, including providing positive role models and mentoring programs, increasing parental involvement, and addressing poverty and other socioeconomic issues.
Education and skill-building programs can also be effective in preventing juvenile delinquency by giving young people the tools they need to succeed in life.
Read more about Juvenile delinquency
brainly.com/question/14438245
#SPJ1
using genetically modified plant varieties that kill insects that chew their leaves. although the use of ddt was banned in the united states in 1972, a test of the body tissue of an average united states resident today would most likely reveal the presence of ddt because
DDT is a pesticide that was widely used in the past but is now banned in many countries, including the United States, because of its harmful effects on the environment and human health.
DDT and its breakdown products can persist in the environment for long periods of time, and they can accumulate in the body tissue of animals and humans.
Therefore, even though DDT was banned in the United States in 1972, a test of the body tissue of an average United States resident today would most likely reveal the presence of DDT because of its persistence in the environment and its ability to bioaccumulate.
The use of genetically modified plant varieties that kill insects that chew their leaves is an alternative method to control pests, it is not related to the presence of DDT in the body tissue.
To learn more about DDT
https://brainly.com/question/12651935
#SPJ4
The first step in developing a comprehensive safety and health program including ppe is to.
The first step in developing a comprehensive safety and health program including personal protective equipment is to: perform a hazard assessment.
What Exactly Is a Hazard Assessment?The process of identifying, evaluating, and managing health risks and safety hazards at work is known as hazard assessment. Additionally, it suggests sensible safety precautions that can be taken to lessen the risks mentioned.
Hazard assessments can range from being a meticulous and involved process to being as straightforward as going through a checklist or simply examining a working space. Even if there are no obvious changes to the workplace or job site, daily risk assessments should be performed. This will guarantee that all risks are taken into account and that all necessary hazard controls are implemented.
What are the two categories of danger assessments?
The two forms of hazard evaluations:
Formal Hazard AssessmentsSite-specific Hazard Assessments.Learn more about hazard assessment with the help of the given link:
brainly.com/question/4805897
#SPJ4
Which best explains the purpose of the Ninth Amendment Brainly?
The purpose of the Ninth Amendment can be best explained as to define specific personal rights.
The Ninth Amendment read : The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The protection of individual rights was a hot topic before, during, and after the Constitution's approval.
The Anti-Federalists eventually pushed for the insertion of a Bill of Rights into the Constitution because they believed that without one, the federal government would be given excessive power.
Federalists argued that listing protected rights would potentially harm individual liberty and make other liberties presumptively unworthy of constitutional protection, despite the fact that they felt the Constitution had established a limited central authority.
In order to uphold the idea that the rights listed in the Constitution are not all-inclusive and final and that the existence of other rights is not in any way diminished or negated by those listed, the Ninth Amendment was created.
To know more about the ninth amendment, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12207842
#SPJ4
Dabney v. State
3. Summarize the Special Court of Appeals’ arguments that Dabney could not commit attempted fourth-degree burglary.
The Special Court of Appeals’ arguments that Dabney could not commit attempted fourth-degree burglary is that thinking of the crime does not make you a criminal and thus, the defendant can not be convicted of a non-exsitence crime.
What is the case of Dabney v. State?The defender "Dabney" was convicted for attempt 4th degree burglary but appealed on the grounds he did not actually commit it.
Hence, he could not be convicted of actus reus of being on the property no criminal significance in its own right absent the mens rea of an intent to commit theft.
Read more about Dabney v. State
brainly.com/question/26537644
#SPJ1
Which amendment are considered the enumeration clause?
Answer:
The enumeration in the constitution, of certain rights ,shall not be constructed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
Explanation:
What type of law developed in England by judges who wrote down their decisions and circulated them to other judges
The common law was developed in early England by judges who wrote down their decisions and circulated them to other judges.
What are common laws?In law, common law is the body of law formed by judges and comparable quasi-judicial tribunals by virtue of being declared in written decisions. It is also known as judicial precedent, judge-made law, or case law. In early England, judges wrote down their rulings and transmitted them to other judges, which led to the development of common law. The fact that "common law" emerges as precedent is its distinguishing feature. In circumstances where the parties differ on the law, a common law court looks to previous precedential decisions of competent courts and synthesizes the principles of those previous cases as applicable to the current facts. If a similar dispute has already been handled, the court is normally compelled to accept the logic employed in that case.As the definition itself says, In early England, judges wrote down their rulings and transmitted them to other judges, which led to the development of common law.
Therefore, the common law was developed in early England by judges who wrote down their decisions and circulated them to other judges.
Know more about common laws here:
https://brainly.com/question/493036
#SPJ4
When an embargo is placed on a country, no imports from or exports to that country are allowed. True or false?.
Answer:
True
Explanation:
No imports from or exports to a nation are permitted when it is under an embargo. Trade restrictions generally hurt an economy. Importers must obtain licenses among other non-tariff obstacles. Tariffs provide income for the government while defending indigenous businesses.
true/false. an example of a government policy barrier to entry would be a scenario in which the antitrust division of the department of justice disallows a merger because it creates a firm that is too dominant and would thus create unfair competition
Yes, the above statement is true, a government policy barrier to entry would be a scenario to prevent unfair competition.
An impediment that prohibits or restricts the implementation of a specific policy instrument is known as a barrier. In extreme cases, these obstacles may cause some policy tools to be disregarded and result in significantly less effective solutions.
"Barriers to entry" is a word used in economics and business to describe elements that may prevent or make it difficult for newcomers to enter a market or industry area, hence limiting competition. These could consist of exorbitant startup costs, administrative impediments, or other obstacles that make it challenging for new competitors to enter a market. Entrance restrictions benefit existing enterprises since they maintain their market share and profitability.
Some typical entrance barriers are high switching costs, great brand recognition, strong patent protections, special tax incentives for established enterprises, and special brand incentives. Another impediment is the need for new firms to obtain licenses or regulatory clearance before opening.
To learn more about Barriers to Entry, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/29656127
#SPJ4
and state any three crime. discuss its effects and prevention
physical – any physical damage including death, injury, or violence. emotional or psychological – any negative influences on psychological and emotional well-being. financial or financial – any cloth or monetary losses.
How do we prevent crime?Increasing the dangers of detection, decreasing the rewards for offending and growing the difficulty of offending are all ways to forestall crime. This form of crime prevention is related with the crook justice gadget - police, courts and prisons - and is the most typically understood form of crime prevention.
Punishments traditionally reflect the seriousness of the crime, the most serious are those which involve violence and/or loss of life. The motives of crime are complex. Poverty, parental neglect, low self-esteem, alcohol and drug abuse can be related to why people smash the law.
Learn more about crime here:
https://brainly.com/question/18471817#SPJ1Affections in baroque usage refers to
Affections in baroque usage refers to emotional states or moods of music.
The late Baroque theorists and composers largely embraced the doctrine of the affections, also known as Doctrine Of Affects or German Affektenlehre.
This was a theory of musical aesthetics that welcomed the idea that music might elicit a variety of particular feelings in the listener.
A common view of music and musicality throughout the Baroque era was the Doctrine of Affections. The Doctrine was a product of the confluence of science and reason with music.
It aimed to reconcile what man knew about science and the human body, and what man thought he knew about music.
To know more about affections in baroque, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/16809659
#SPJ4
Is Mein Kampf available in English?
A modern, easy-to-understand, truly complete, and uncensored edition of Mein Kampf has been published for the first time in 65 years, revealing more than any previous translation.
In addition, this hardcover book is the first translation to be available in audio format in English.
Can Mein Kampf be purchased in English?The title, which was translated as "My Struggle in the UK" instead of "My Battle in America," is the only difference between the American and British versions. and that Dugdale is mentioned as a translator in the American version, whereas his name is not mentioned in the British version. The initial cost was $3.00, which is equivalent to $63.13 in 20201.
Can Mein Kampf be purchased?Many people would prefer that Mein Kampf not be reprinted because they are aware of this. It is already available in libraries and used bookstores for scholars studying it.
To learn more about Mein Kampf here:
https://brainly.com/question/4058328
#SPJ4
How did the Munich affect Germany's actions in the Czech region of the Sudetenland?
The Munich Agreement of 1938 had a great influence on German behavior in the Sudetenland of the Czech Republic. Signed by Germany, Great Britain, France, and Italy, the agreement allowed Germany to annex the Sudetenland, an area with a large German-speaking population in Czechoslovakia.
The annexation of the Sudetenland was an important step toward Hitler's goal of creating a Greater Germany and dealt a serious blow to the sovereignty of Czechoslovakia. The Munich Agreement yielded to Hitler's one of his demands practically without objection. The Sudetenland was of strategic importance as it was an important industrial and agricultural area and had many natural resources.
The Munich Agreement greatly increased the German military presence in the Sudetenland, established a German government, and imposed Nazi policies on the local population. This has led to massive human rights violations and persecution of Czechs and other ethnic minorities in the region.
The Munich Agreement also had a major impact on the political situation in Europe. The Nazis saw this as a sign of weakness and encouraged further territorial expansion. This led to the annexation of the rest of Czechoslovakia in March 1939, the invasion of Poland in September 1939, and ultimately the outbreak of World War II.
Learn more about Munich Agreement and its impact on Germany's actions here: https://brainly.com/question/17206743
#SPJ4
A trial judge presiding over a lawsuit plans to call a witness to the stand and question her. May the judge do so
A trial judge presiding over a lawsuit plans to call a witness to the stand and question her. May the judge do so to hear the first hand information of what the witness saw.
Who is a witness?This is a person that is called to testify in a court of law. The reason the witness takes the stand is because he or she has seen or heard something concerning the case.
Hence the judge would have to make the person take the stand in order to testify.
Read more on witness here:
https://brainly.com/question/1259392
match the correct laws to the examples in which they apply. use each law only once. drag the words in the left-hand column to the appropriate blanks in the right-hand column. mastering astronomy chapter 4
The laws and their applications are:
Kepler's second law of planetary motion explains why Earth's orbital speed varies over the course of each year.Newton's first law of motion explains why a spaceship with no forces acting on it will continue moving even if it has no fuel.Newton's third law of motion tells us that, when your are standing, the ground is pushing up on you with a force that precisely balances the downward force of your weight.Kepler's first law of planetary motion explains why Earth's distance from the Sun varies over the course of each year.What are scientific laws?Scientific laws or laws of science are propositions that explain or forecast a variety of natural occurrences and are based on repeated tests or observations. Throughout a variety of situations, the word "law" is used in all branches of natural science.
Read more on scientific laws here: https://brainly.com/question/1432753
#SPJ1
Identify Central Issues Which groups would benefit from repealing the high tariffs known as the Corn Laws
Merchants and free traders stand to benefit from the repeal of the Corn Laws. This is because they would have larger markets to sell their goods in, and grain prices would fall, making bread more affordable.
Tariffs and other trade restrictions on imported food and corn were imposed in the United Kingdom between 1815 and 1846.
In British English, the term corn refers to all cereal grains, including wheat, oats, and barley. They were intended to keep corn prices high in order to benefit domestic producers, and they represented British mercantilism.
The Corn Laws restricted the import of cheap corn, first by prohibiting imports below a certain price, and later by imposing steep import duties, making it prohibitively expensive to import it from abroad, even when food supplies were scarce.
Learn more about "Corn Laws" to visit here;
https://brainly.com/question/8578521
#SPJ4
What are the stages of a lawyer?
Answer:
Complete a Bachelor's Degree Program You Enjoy. A bachelor's degree is the minimum educational requirement for admission to law school. ...
Pass the Law School Admission Test. ...
Identify Law Schools and Complete Applications. ...
Earn a Juris Doctor Degree. ...
Pass the Bar Examination. ...
Advance Your Career.
Which of the following explanations best matches the Supreme Court's application of the principle of due process of law
Answer:
The Supreme Court applies the principle of due process of law to protect individuals from arbitrary and unjust government action. This means that the government must provide procedural safeguards, such as notice and a fair hearing, to ensure fairness and prevent unwarranted government actions. This protection of the rights of individuals ensures that the government is held to a standard of fairness when taking actions that affect individuals. As such, the Court views due process of law as an important protection of fundamental rights and a way of checking government power.
emergency warning equipment should be stored where
What is the scope of judicial review Class 10?
If a law or action of a local, state, or national government goes against the Constitution, judicial review can rule that it is invalid.
What is the judiciary's scope in India?India's judicial review under article 226 Article 226(1) states that any High Court in India's territorial jurisdiction is authorized to issue directives, orders, and writs to any person or authority, including the government, for the purpose of enforcing basic rights and other legal rights.
What role does the judiciary play in Class 10 India?The judiciary's primary responsibility is to uphold the rule of law and guarantee its supremacy. It ensures that democracy does not give way to individual or group dictatorship and that disputes are resolved in accordance with the law.
To learn more about judicial review here:
https://brainly.com/question/966716
#SPJ4
Which of these is an example of an injunction?
Answer:
Injunction is the act of commanding or ordering
Explanation:
You didn't provide any examples to choose from so just choose the one that fits the description
How can a foreigner become a lawyer in the US?
When a patient is covered under more than one policy, __________ is used to ensure the claim is not paid to more than 100%.
What was an argument in favor of federalism at the time of the writing of the Constitution?
An argument in favor of federalism at the time of the writing of the Constitution was that the, federalists argued for the counterbalancing the branches of the government.
In the light of the charges which the Constitution is said to have created a strong national government, they were thus able to argue that the separation of the powers among the three branches of government is said to have protected the rights of the people.
However, here the federalists tend to argue for the counterbalancing of the branches of government. Thus, the federalism would provide for a stronger national government than the one which existed under the Articles of Confederation.
To learn more about the federalism here:
https://brainly.com/question/12835949
#SPJ4
HUMAN RIGHTS. Based on UDHR, CEDAW, and CRC, Is there any right deprived to you? How do you feel? Who was responsible for its denial?
Based on the UDHR, CEDAW and CDC, there is no deprived right for me, however legally human, women's and children's rights can be fulfilled, we know that there is still a long way to go for greater social equity.
What is the UDHR?It corresponds to a document adopted by the United Nations in 1948 which attests to the set of inalienable rights of man, that is, the basic rights of any individual received at the time of his birth, such as the right to life, liberty and security. .
CEDAW corresponds to the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, being an international treaty of the United Nations of 1979, which specifies the rights of women.
The CRC is the Convention on the Rights of the Child, that is, the protection of all children on freedom from neglect, abuse and any type of violence.
Therefore, as much as such conventions are in force in most countries of the world, there are still many changes and efforts that need to be made so that every individual has a dignified life, with opportunities, education and development, this being a collective effort to be achieved.
Find out more about Human Rights on:
https://brainly.com/question/1261546
#SPJ1
your license may get suspended if ____ within a 12-month period.
Answer: If you have 4 or more traffic convictions
Explanation: quizlet
What are some advantages of a lifetime appointment?
Some advantages of a lifetime appointment for the federal judges is that the purpose of giving the federal judges such extraordinary job security is in order to remove them from the political pressures.
There is the basic purpose of a lifetime appointment for the federal judges which is in order to assure that the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and to protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branch.
However, among the 40 percent who tend to favor the lifetime appointments for some judges, there were several people who pointed that to how the setup protects judicial independence.
To learn more about the federal judges here:
https://brainly.com/question/2824627
#SPJ4
what supreme court case set the precedent of judicial review?
This theory was discovered by the court in Marbury v. Madison (1803). The Court had to determine which was greater, law of the land, in this case: a Congress Act, or the Constitution.
The Supreme Court was granted original jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus by the Judiciary Act of 1789. (legal orders that can compel government authorities to act in accordance with the law). The Supreme Court recognized that the Constitution did not give the power of original jurisdiction to the courts in this matter despite a lawsuit being filed under this Act. The Supreme Law of the Land is established by Article VI of the Constitution, hence the Court ruled that a congressional act that is in disagreement of the Constitution cannot be upheld.
To know more about Supreme Court :
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ4